Recently, I took another look at Folks Finance's market data, and it's still quite interesting.



Currently, approximately 5,000 $FOLKS incentives are scattered across various markets. This distribution method is quite intriguing—it can effectively support revenue performance without causing market distortions due to over-incentivization. Such a sense of balance is rare.

Looking at the Monad ecosystem, $MON performs quite well among similar projects. From the incentive structure and market feedback, both projects are exploring sustainable growth models on their respective paths. These subtle differences actually reflect varying team understandings of long-term ecosystem development.
MON8.15%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugpullTherapistvip
· 12-20 20:17
Folks, this incentive distribution does have some substance, but is 5,000 tokens really enough? Haha The Mon ecosystem is all about fire and passion, but I'm just worried it might be more hype than substance again. These two projects have quite different roadmaps. Let's see who can make it to the end.
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperervip
· 12-20 03:39
Folks, this method of distributing the 5000 incentives in a decentralized way is indeed quite good. Compared to projects that throw all their incentives at once, it's much more sensible. Over at Mon, things are also not bad. Both projects are taking a solid, strength-based approach. In the long run, it still comes down to fundamentals. These subtle differences actually reveal the team's level the most. Not everyone understands the meaning of sustainability.
View OriginalReply0
ParallelChainMaxivip
· 12-17 21:02
The allocation of 5000 FOLKS is indeed meticulous, but how many can truly stick to it? --- Monad's incentive structure is a bit innovative, but it depends on how they handle the follow-up. --- Balance sounds good in theory, but the key is whether it can last until the next bull market. --- Both projects are still exploring; frankly, it depends on which team is more solid. --- Is decentralized incentives actually an advantage? It feels a bit counterintuitive. --- Sustainable growth sounds wonderful, but who has actually achieved it in this market? --- MON's performance is okay, but compared to similar projects, it's just average—nothing special. --- The difference in details is whether they can survive the winter.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 12-17 20:58
Wow Folks, this incentive distribution method is really meticulous, unlike some projects that throw money around until everything is a mess. That being said, MON has indeed shown some potential recently, but whether these two projects can really succeed still depends on their subsequent actions.
View OriginalReply0
Web3Educatorvip
· 12-17 20:52
ngl the incentive distribution pattern here is lowkey sophisticated—5k $FOLKS spread across markets without breaking everything? that's the kind of restraint most teams can't pull off
Reply0
SneakyFlashloanvip
· 12-17 20:51
5,000 FOLKS distributed incentives? This move is indeed quite interesting, with no one-size-fits-all reckless approach. MON is also trying to find a balance. It feels like everyone is now competing on how to avoid over-incentivizing... The industry is finally starting to learn to be smart.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteranvip
· 12-17 20:41
Alright, this idea of incentive distribution does have some merit, but can 5,000 FOLKS truly be sustained when spread out? As for MON, I want to see what happens next. Just because it looks good now doesn't mean it will stay stable later.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)