Is Quantum Computing the 'Ultimate Catalyst' for Bitcoin? Michael Saylor Makes a Surprising Assertion: Satoshi Nakamoto's Design Will Become Even Stronger Because of It!
Michael Saylor's perspective is very profound. He transforms seemingly threatening technologies like quantum computing into an opportunity to demonstrate Bitcoin's resilience. Below, I will outline his core logic and explore how this shift could fundamentally strengthen Bitcoin's value.
The core argument is that Saylor believes quantum computing will not destroy Bitcoin but will instead trigger a mandatory network upgrade, eliminating insecure old bitcoins and permanently reducing the effective supply, thereby achieving a "quantum leap."
🔄 Bitcoin's Upgradability Is Key
Saylor's confidence fundamentally rests on the fact that the Bitcoin protocol itself is not static but has the capacity for continuous upgrades. He repeatedly emphasizes, "Bitcoin is a protocol; its software is upgraded every year."
As the threat of quantum computing approaches, the Bitcoin community is fully capable of implementing a consensus upgrade (such as a hard fork) to migrate the signature algorithm from the currently vulnerable elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA) to quantum-resistant cryptography (Post-Quantum Cryptography, PQC). In fact, industry players like Blockstream CEO Adam Back have already proposed adopting NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) standardized post-quantum algorithms (such as SLH-DSA) to safeguard Bitcoin's future.
More importantly, Saylor points out that current global financial and technological infrastructure (including Google, Microsoft, and even the US government) widely use encryption algorithms (like SHA-256) that could be cracked by quantum computers. Therefore, addressing the quantum threat is a global challenge, not one Bitcoin faces alone. He believes these tech giants have no motivation to develop technology that could destroy the foundations of the existing financial system.
💎 How Does the “Quantum Leap” Enhance Value?
Saylor's insight is that this upgrade process itself will have a profound impact on Bitcoin's supply and demand fundamentals:
1. Net Security Enhancement: After a successful upgrade, all active, user-controlled bitcoins will be transferred to a more robust quantum-resistant security system, resulting in a qualitative leap in the network's security foundation.
2. Permanent Supply Contraction: This upgrade will ruthlessly expose a fact: those bitcoins that have been dormant for a long time due to lost private keys (estimated to be a large number) will be unable to be migrated. These bitcoins will be permanently frozen on the old, insecure chain, effectively disappearing from circulation. This is akin to a forced, large-scale supply contraction.
3. Further Increase in Scarcity: One of Bitcoin's core value propositions is its fixed supply cap of 21 million coins. After this upgrade, the actual circulating supply will further decrease, making scarcity even more pronounced. Saylor previously predicted that when Wall Street allocates 10% of its reserves to Bitcoin, the price could reach $1 million. The supply contraction will accelerate this process.
⚠️ True Threats and Industry Challenges
Although Saylor remains optimistic about the quantum threat, he also reminds us that, compared to distant quantum attacks, current phishing and social engineering attacks are more immediate and realistic dangers.
At the same time, achieving the “quantum leap” faces challenges. Bitcoin's decentralized nature means that upgrades require broad community consensus, and the transition process could be complex and time-consuming. Additionally, the industry is still exploring which specific post-quantum cryptography solutions to adopt and how to implement them smoothly.
We hope this analysis helps you gain a more comprehensive understanding of Michael Saylor's views. If you are interested in the technical details of post-quantum cryptography or Bitcoin's upgrade mechanisms, we can continue the discussion.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Is Quantum Computing the 'Ultimate Catalyst' for Bitcoin? Michael Saylor Makes a Surprising Assertion: Satoshi Nakamoto's Design Will Become Even Stronger Because of It!
Michael Saylor's perspective is very profound. He transforms seemingly threatening technologies like quantum computing into an opportunity to demonstrate Bitcoin's resilience. Below, I will outline his core logic and explore how this shift could fundamentally strengthen Bitcoin's value.
The core argument is that Saylor believes quantum computing will not destroy Bitcoin but will instead trigger a mandatory network upgrade, eliminating insecure old bitcoins and permanently reducing the effective supply, thereby achieving a "quantum leap."
🔄 Bitcoin's Upgradability Is Key
Saylor's confidence fundamentally rests on the fact that the Bitcoin protocol itself is not static but has the capacity for continuous upgrades. He repeatedly emphasizes, "Bitcoin is a protocol; its software is upgraded every year."
As the threat of quantum computing approaches, the Bitcoin community is fully capable of implementing a consensus upgrade (such as a hard fork) to migrate the signature algorithm from the currently vulnerable elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA) to quantum-resistant cryptography (Post-Quantum Cryptography, PQC). In fact, industry players like Blockstream CEO Adam Back have already proposed adopting NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) standardized post-quantum algorithms (such as SLH-DSA) to safeguard Bitcoin's future.
More importantly, Saylor points out that current global financial and technological infrastructure (including Google, Microsoft, and even the US government) widely use encryption algorithms (like SHA-256) that could be cracked by quantum computers. Therefore, addressing the quantum threat is a global challenge, not one Bitcoin faces alone. He believes these tech giants have no motivation to develop technology that could destroy the foundations of the existing financial system.
💎 How Does the “Quantum Leap” Enhance Value?
Saylor's insight is that this upgrade process itself will have a profound impact on Bitcoin's supply and demand fundamentals:
1. Net Security Enhancement: After a successful upgrade, all active, user-controlled bitcoins will be transferred to a more robust quantum-resistant security system, resulting in a qualitative leap in the network's security foundation.
2. Permanent Supply Contraction: This upgrade will ruthlessly expose a fact: those bitcoins that have been dormant for a long time due to lost private keys (estimated to be a large number) will be unable to be migrated. These bitcoins will be permanently frozen on the old, insecure chain, effectively disappearing from circulation. This is akin to a forced, large-scale supply contraction.
3. Further Increase in Scarcity: One of Bitcoin's core value propositions is its fixed supply cap of 21 million coins. After this upgrade, the actual circulating supply will further decrease, making scarcity even more pronounced. Saylor previously predicted that when Wall Street allocates 10% of its reserves to Bitcoin, the price could reach $1 million. The supply contraction will accelerate this process.
⚠️ True Threats and Industry Challenges
Although Saylor remains optimistic about the quantum threat, he also reminds us that, compared to distant quantum attacks, current phishing and social engineering attacks are more immediate and realistic dangers.
At the same time, achieving the “quantum leap” faces challenges. Bitcoin's decentralized nature means that upgrades require broad community consensus, and the transition process could be complex and time-consuming. Additionally, the industry is still exploring which specific post-quantum cryptography solutions to adopt and how to implement them smoothly.
We hope this analysis helps you gain a more comprehensive understanding of Michael Saylor's views. If you are interested in the technical details of post-quantum cryptography or Bitcoin's upgrade mechanisms, we can continue the discussion.