When a smart contract hasn't renounced its ownership, the developer retains significant control—and that's where things get risky. Without renunciation, they could flip the script whenever they want. Need a few examples? They can add your wallet to a blacklist overnight. They can pump the tax rate up to 99%, effectively freezing your position. Or here's the real nightmare: they can mint unlimited tokens and dump them to crash the price while you're holding bags.
The critical checkpoint: always verify whether Mint Authority has been disabled. If it hasn't, you're giving the dev an unlimited printing press with your capital as collateral. Don't skip this step—it's the difference between a legitimate project and a potential exit trap.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunter
· 2h ago
ngl mint authority checks are literally the difference between holding actual alpha and being exit liquidity. seen too many devs keep that backdoor open—not even subtle about it either.
Reply0
SleepyValidator
· 12-12 17:16
Damn, it's the same old story. Only after someone gets dev-dusted do they realize they should check permissions.
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueen
· 12-12 16:53
Another bloody lesson, we really need to keep a close eye on the mint authority.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 12-12 16:53
It's the same old trick again. Developers hold the remote control, and you're still hoping they'll have a conscience?
I've seen through it long ago. I won't touch any project that hasn't disabled minting.
Blacklists, freezing, unlimited printing of money... these tricks are truly endless. Once bitten, twice shy.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 12-12 16:40
Whoa, another rug warning... It's really urgent to check the mint authority.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 12-12 16:34
Damn, another project where a developer secretly left a backdoor. Checking mint permissions really needs to be taken seriously.
Contract permissions matter more than you think.
When a smart contract hasn't renounced its ownership, the developer retains significant control—and that's where things get risky. Without renunciation, they could flip the script whenever they want. Need a few examples? They can add your wallet to a blacklist overnight. They can pump the tax rate up to 99%, effectively freezing your position. Or here's the real nightmare: they can mint unlimited tokens and dump them to crash the price while you're holding bags.
The critical checkpoint: always verify whether Mint Authority has been disabled. If it hasn't, you're giving the dev an unlimited printing press with your capital as collateral. Don't skip this step—it's the difference between a legitimate project and a potential exit trap.