2025-12-10 01:43:37

Musk and Jensen Huang suddenly got on the same wavelength.

$BTC $ETH $DOGE

One said, "Generating capacity is the currency of the future," and the other immediately followed up with, "Bitcoin is portable energy currency." Two leading figures of the AI era have pulled Bitcoin out of the old "digital gold" narrative and thrown it into the new battlefield of "energy standard."

Why is this worth pondering?

**Let’s look at the logic chain:**
With AI advancing rapidly, electricity has become a scarce resource—whoever controls electricity controls the right to print money.
How can the value of energy from Norwegian hydroelectric plants or Middle Eastern solar farms be instantly transferred globally? The answer might be Bitcoin.
It doesn’t need bank endorsements or rely on national borders—if there’s computing power, value can flow.

**Now for the narrative upgrade:**
"Digital gold" is about value storage and risk hedging—a passive defense.
"Energy currency" is about underlying assets and active settlement.
The former is bricks in a vault; the latter is the medium in the power grid.

As the monetary system starts moving towards an energy standard—Bitcoin is already closest to the finish line.

The new story has begun. Which side are you on?

BTC-2.3%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZenZKPlayer

· 12-11 08:11

The logic of energy backing is indeed tight, but it still feels a bit too idealistic. Electricity as currency... Norway has been selling electricity for a while now, so why must it go through Bitcoin?

View OriginalReply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 12-11 03:59

The concept of energy backing is interesting, but it still feels like a story. In reality, whoever controls the electricity wins. Bitcoin is at most just an intermediary.

View OriginalReply0

LadderToolGuy

· 12-10 04:22

The logic of energy standard has actually been said for a long time, but the two big guys feel different when they sing together --- Wait, power scarcity? Isn't mining cool? --- I just want to know what this theory means to Xiao San, or continue to tunbei --- Power generation capacity = money printing rights, I didn't expect this brain hole, absolutely --- To be honest, it still feels like a concept hype, but it can really make up a story --- Bitcoin has gone from gold to energy currency, and this is too fast to turn around haha --- If this is the case, then the advantages of renewable energy countries will be great --- No blowing or black, this narrative is much fresher than before, and it is worth pondering --- In the AI era, there is nothing wrong with whoever controls the electricity, so whether BTC can truly carry this value is the key --- So should I settle BTC or energy stocks now...

View OriginalReply0

NftDeepBreather

· 12-10 02:13

Damn, I never thought about it from the energy standard angle before. Feels like a whole new world just opened up. --- These two big shots are really working together perfectly this time, moving BTC from just a pension asset to a productivity tool. --- To put it nicely, it’s an upgrade, but honestly, isn’t it just a new story to fleece retail investors… But I have to admit, the logic does hold up. --- Wait, so does this mean hashrate is the money supply? Then miners are basically the central bank now. --- If this energy currency theory is really going to happen, it’ll definitely need the push from people at their level. --- But what I care more about is who’s going to guarantee a stable energy supply, otherwise this is just talk on paper. --- Alright, alright, here’s another new reason for me to go all in. I just love the feeling when big shots add spice to each other’s stories.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 12-10 02:13

This whole concept of energy-backed currency... honestly, it does sound smoother than digital gold, but in the end, it's just another battle for narrative control. --- When two big shots start telling stories, retail investors start following the hype and buying coins. I've seen this play out way too many times. --- Wait a minute, if controlling electricity means controlling the power to print money, then the big miners would have already won. Why are they still messing around? --- The concept of energy currency is definitely fresh, but the real question is whether electricity costs can stay this cheap in the long run. --- No matter how good it sounds, Bitcoin still relies on computing power to sustain itself—it can't escape that fundamental truth. --- All I want to know is, who really holds the right to print money in the future: the storytellers or the miners? --- Feels like they're setting up the narrative for the next price surge... But honestly, this story is way more convincing than the old ones.

View OriginalReply0

MemeEchoer

· 12-10 02:11

This energy standard logic sounds great, but whoever really controls electricity wins—Bitcoin is just an intermediary, right? --- Huang and Musk’s combo move this time feels like they’re setting the stage for a big play. --- So in the end, it’s still about fighting for the right to price energy. The crypto space is about to get wrecked by capital again. --- Wait, does this logic mean that as long as I have a hydropower plant, I can print money? I’d better hurry up and buy land in Norway. --- The energy currency narrative is indeed fresh, but it seems to conflict with the current green energy endorsement narrative. --- Damn, if you think about it this way, ASIC miners become energy settlement tools—the whole game changes. --- To put it bluntly, it’s still big players finding new narratives to repackage their chips, while retail investors remain cannon fodder. --- There’s something to it—energy really is key in the AI era. But can Bitcoin truly become a settlement medium?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 12-10 02:09

Damn, the energy standard angle is brilliant, never thought of it before. Wait, does this logic actually hold up? Who guarantees the exchange rate between energy and Bitcoin? I still think it’s being hyped, but it’s definitely interesting. Musk’s mouth, huh, anything he says will get hyped. Bitcoin as an energy medium? That’s way too utopian. These two put on a show, and everyone else just goes all in—same old routine. Energy standard sounds even more imaginative than digital gold, count me in.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 12-10 01:50

The perspective of energy-backed currency is indeed fresh, but it's still a long way off. But wait, is this logic really consistent? When electricity is scarce, are we still going to burn electricity to mine coins? How did these two guys suddenly get on the same page? Weren't they talking past each other before? Honestly, Bitcoin as an energy medium sounds sophisticated, but what about in practice? Energy-backed currency sounds impressive, but the question is, who gets to decide?

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#GateNovTransparencyReportReleased
9.44K Popularity
#FedRateCutComing
640.83K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
58.5K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
13.2K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
541.78K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
中本聪中本聪
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%
2
BUSDBUSD
MC:$3.79KHolders:3
0.93%
3
METAMETAMASK
MC:$3.65KHolders:2
0.00%
4
GAGTGATE
MC:$3.66KHolders:1
0.78%
5
GClockGClock
MC:$3.69KHolders:2
0.13%

Sitemap