If authorities genuinely wanted to tokenize their land holdings and split them into fractions, wouldn't they have pulled the trigger by now?
Here's the thing — blockchain isn't exactly a prerequisite for that.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenWhisperer
· 12-10 16:13
Profitable opportunities will naturally be taken.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapist
· 12-10 13:54
Technology is not the key point.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12-10 00:53
Find the optimal solution
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 12-09 13:56
There’s really no need for a blockchain solution.
View OriginalReply0
ZenMiner
· 12-08 00:03
Blockchain is just a tool.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 12-08 00:03
It’s better to last long in the market than to be a newbie.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 12-08 00:02
I stopped playing with land a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationAlert
· 12-07 23:47
There is only one truth.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 12-07 23:36
The chain is not the main focus.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 12-07 23:36
Chain transformation is actually not a real necessity.
If authorities genuinely wanted to tokenize their land holdings and split them into fractions, wouldn't they have pulled the trigger by now?
Here's the thing — blockchain isn't exactly a prerequisite for that.