If authorities genuinely wanted to tokenize their land holdings and split them into fractions, wouldn't they have pulled the trigger by now?



Here's the thing — blockchain isn't exactly a prerequisite for that.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenWhisperervip
· 12-10 16:13
Profitable opportunities will naturally be taken.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapistvip
· 12-10 13:54
Technology is not the key point.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 12-10 00:53
Find the optimal solution
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivorvip
· 12-09 13:56
There’s really no need for a blockchain solution.
View OriginalReply0
ZenMinervip
· 12-08 00:03
Blockchain is just a tool.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunstervip
· 12-08 00:03
It’s better to last long in the market than to be a newbie.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLickervip
· 12-08 00:02
I stopped playing with land a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationAlertvip
· 12-07 23:47
There is only one truth.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccountvip
· 12-07 23:36
The chain is not the main focus.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatchervip
· 12-07 23:36
Chain transformation is actually not a real necessity.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)