2025-12-07 21:29:34

A North American city just deployed AI-powered body cameras for law enforcement that can instantly match faces against a watchlist of roughly 7,000 individuals tagged as high-risk. Surveillance tech keeps pushing boundaries—but at what cost to privacy?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 2025-12-10 16:44

Here we go again, this thing is like the modern version of Big Brother... A list of 7,000 people labeled as high risk, who set the standard?

View OriginalReply0

DYORMaster

· 2025-12-10 15:15

Here we go again with this? A blacklist of 7,000 people... It's called high risk, but who defined that?

View OriginalReply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 2025-12-09 15:50

NGL, this approach is pretty intense—matching a list of 7,000 people... To put it nicely, it's for prevention, but to put it bluntly, the big boss is watching you.

View OriginalReply0

QuorumVoter

· 2025-12-08 07:06

ngl, large-scale facial recognition should have been questioned a long time ago. Who decides the blacklist of 7,000 people? What are the criteria? Don’t blame AI for all the wrongful accusations and miscarriages of justice in the end.

View OriginalReply0

SelfStaking

· 2025-12-07 21:57

Listen, a blacklist of 7,000 people? That's just ridiculous... surveillance is eroding freedom step by step.

View OriginalReply0

TopEscapeArtist

· 2025-12-07 21:55

Look at this thing... yet another signal that looks like a "golden cross" on the technical side, but in reality has already broken down. 7,000 people on the blacklist, isn't this just the head-and-shoulders top pattern of society? Every day they talk about risk prevention, but in the end, they've pushed this whole surveillance thing to a historical high. Truly addicted to buying the top at a high, everyone. Didn't expect surveillance to pick up that habit too. Privacy? That already broke through the stop-loss long ago.

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 2025-12-07 21:54

This monitoring technology really can't hold up anymore. How was the list of 7,000 people decided, and who has the final say?

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForMemes