There's an interesting policy contradiction brewing: pushing back on renewable energy while simultaneously racing for AI dominance. The energy demands of AI infrastructure and the anti-renewables stance don't quite add up. Wonder how this tension plays out for the tech sector's power-hungry data centers.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceWatchervip
· 12-04 20:45
Isn't this just contradicting themselves? They want AI computing power but don't want green energy. Seriously… how much coal do data centers have to burn for this?
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaservip
· 12-04 15:26
This logic is really broken—on one hand, they're against renewable energy, and on the other, they're burning through electricity like crazy for AI. What happens if data centers don't get enough power?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryvip
· 12-04 15:18
Isn't this logic self-contradictory? Opposing renewable energy but pushing for AI? These computing power monsters consume electricity, which goes against the stance against green energy.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapienvip
· 12-04 15:10
This logic really doesn't hold up... Cutting new energy while still wanting to push AI? Data centers consume electricity like sharks—who's going to supply the power?
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplantvip
· 12-04 15:05
This logic gap is huge—on one hand, they're restricting renewable energy, and on the other, they want AI dominance. What will data centers run on then?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)