The incident where Cookie suddenly terminated the Astra Nova campaign has taken an interesting turn.
There were voices from the community saying "the team is dumping after listing," and Cookie also frankly admitted, "We listed Astra Nova without properly researching it." In other words, listing fees were prioritized over project quality.
Because of this uproar, I’d like to believe that from now on, they’ll properly review projects to avoid impacting other projects like useTria. Ultimately, whether the platform can learn from failures like this shows its true value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Tokenomics911
· 12-04 08:51
Same old trick: they list coins as soon as they get paid, then shift the blame when something goes wrong. Classic crypto business tactics.
View OriginalReply0
BlockDetective
· 12-04 08:49
Another classic rug pull right after listing the token. This time, Cookie got exposed—they listed the token without even conducting any investigation. That’s really bold.
The incident where Cookie suddenly terminated the Astra Nova campaign has taken an interesting turn.
There were voices from the community saying "the team is dumping after listing," and Cookie also frankly admitted, "We listed Astra Nova without properly researching it." In other words, listing fees were prioritized over project quality.
Because of this uproar, I’d like to believe that from now on, they’ll properly review projects to avoid impacting other projects like useTria. Ultimately, whether the platform can learn from failures like this shows its true value.