Recently, a leading exchange announced a brand-new co-CEO management structure, causing quite a stir on social media. Honestly, most people are fixated on the so-called power struggles. But if you ask me? Put those rumors aside, and you'll see something much more interesting—when a platform’s user base surpasses 300 million, its organizational structure inevitably has to evolve.
This isn’t some power game. It’s a management innovation driven by the effects of scale. The single-decision-maker model works well in small teams, but when your user base reaches this size? What you need is a systematic governance framework, not individual heroism. So instead of seeing this adjustment as a personnel earthquake, it’s better to understand it as a necessary "system rearchitecture"—the company is adapting to its new scale in the most pragmatic way.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CrossChainBreather
· 12-04 14:26
A user base of 300 million does indeed force an architectural upgrade, but can effective system governance really be achieved?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 12-04 06:50
Dual-CEO system? To put it simply, it's just that making decisions alone is too exhausting, so the risk is shared.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacy
· 12-04 06:50
honestly the dual-ceo framing is just governance theater masking what's really path dependency at scale... but yeah, sub-optimal incentive structures when you're dealing with 300M users, nfl
Reply0
GmGnSleeper
· 12-04 06:49
Damn, someone finally said it. It's just that simple, no need for any conspiracy theories.
Recently, a leading exchange announced a brand-new co-CEO management structure, causing quite a stir on social media. Honestly, most people are fixated on the so-called power struggles. But if you ask me? Put those rumors aside, and you'll see something much more interesting—when a platform’s user base surpasses 300 million, its organizational structure inevitably has to evolve.
This isn’t some power game. It’s a management innovation driven by the effects of scale. The single-decision-maker model works well in small teams, but when your user base reaches this size? What you need is a systematic governance framework, not individual heroism. So instead of seeing this adjustment as a personnel earthquake, it’s better to understand it as a necessary "system rearchitecture"—the company is adapting to its new scale in the most pragmatic way.