BONK.fun adjusts fee allocation: 51% of fees will be used to buy back BONK

2025-12-04 03:44:19

Abstract generation in progress

[Bitpush] BONK.fun made a big move today—the platform will now use 51% of its fees to buy back BONK.

How did this 51% come about? It’s actually a consolidation of previously scattered portions: originally, 35% was used for buyback and burn, 4% went through the SBR channel, 2% was allocated to BONKrewards, and now all of these are combined. Adding the 10% that was already given to Bonk, Inc., the total is now unified at 51% and managed through the DAT mechanism.

According to the official statement, this adjustment won’t affect the buying pressure on BONK. The main goal is to strengthen the strategic reserves, with the long-term aim of accumulating 5% of the circulating supply. Community spending will continue as usual, and the marketing and operations budgets remain unchanged.

BONK2.85%

SBR-2.87%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WinterWarmthCat

· 12-05 06:16

51% buyback? Sounds pretty intense, but honestly, it’s just moving money from the left pocket to the right. --- So basically, it still relies on buybacks to support the price. We’ve all seen this playbook before. --- No change in buying strength? Then what about the previous 4% and 2%? Did they just disappear? --- Strategic reserves reaching 5% of circulating supply? That seems a bit tough. --- In the end, it’s just fancy integration, right? If you get it, you get it. --- This move looks like it’s laying the groundwork for some critical moment. Interesting. --- Hmm… let’s just call it optimization. Either way, I still have the same amount of tokens. --- The key point is the community budget hasn’t changed, that’s good. --- Wait, integrating directly into the DAT mechanism? Could there be any variables in between?

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 12-04 11:55

Here we go again with reallocating fee distribution. Basically, it’s just piling all the funds into buybacks, and calling it “strategic reserve” for the sake of sounding good. I just don’t really buy it. That “51%” figure sounds impressive, but in reality, it’s just rearranging things with nothing particularly new. Everyone’s playing with the DAT mechanism now—it feels like old wine in a new bottle. Let’s see if it can really support 5% of the circulating supply. If it’s such a big move, why do they keep stressing that “buying pressure remains unchanged”? Feels a bit like protesting too much. They keep tweaking the fee structure every day, and all I want to know is how this actually affects retail investors’ returns. Can anyone explain that clearly?

View OriginalReply0

ZenMiner

· 12-04 08:25

Eh, consolidating the fee structure like this seems intended to centralize the buyback power, but could this end up sidelining the community fund... Actually, it's not too bad—as long as they really can stack up to 5% of the circulating supply, it'll be solid. The worry is that it might just end up being empty promises again. 51% sounds intimidating, but the key is whether the actual buy pressure really increases. If not, it's just old wine in a new bottle. A thicker reserve does seem reliable, but this move feels a bit like paving the way for some big moves later on. Gotta keep an eye on it.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurner

· 12-04 04:13

Oops, this move is basically piling all the money into buybacks—in plain terms, they're still bearish on the current price. That 51% sounds aggressive, but the core logic is just two words: position building. Strategic reserves need to accumulate up to 5% of the circulating supply—how long will that take? The on-chain data is right there. If they really go down this road, whether they can hold the floor price is the key issue. I’m betting they can, but only if the community actually keeps spending like usual, and it doesn’t end up being another round of PPT promises.

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 12-04 04:11

Another round of integration—calling it “strategic reserve” sounds nice, but in reality it’s just dumping directly on the market. --- 51% buyback sounds aggressive, but isn’t it just merging all those messy allocations into one? It’s all just a numbers game. --- Wait, does this change actually mean the burn ratio is going down instead? --- Ha, here we go again with “no change in buying pressure.” Like I’d believe that—every adjustment they say the same thing. --- Reserve up to 5% of circulating supply? How long do they have to hoard for that? I just want to know when they’ll dump. --- Alright then, as long as the community funds aren’t being wasted. As long as those two numbers match up, I’ll feel okay. --- Looks like the team really does care about the price. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be obsessing over distribution all the time. --- Honestly, I don’t see much difference with this adjustment. It just moves the money from the left pocket to the right.

View OriginalReply0

SocialFiQueen

· 12-04 04:11

Playing the numbers game again—51% sounds impressive, but it's really just moving money around. If the actual buying pressure hasn't changed, what's the point? Whoever has the thickest strategic reserves stands to benefit the most. But to be fair, this move is pretty smart. It looks huge on the surface, but the risk transfer is actually pretty clever. Will this buyback mechanism really deliver results, or is it just another round of "planned" promises? I just want to know when that 5% target will actually be achieved—it's not like we haven't heard this kind of story before.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 12-04 04:09

Here they go again, calling it innovation just by lumping scattered fees together? It's still the same amount of money in the end, just under a different name. --- A 51% buyback sounds impressive, but honestly, it's just repackaging the previous 35% + 4% + 2%. Feels a bit like moving money from one pocket to another... --- Strategic reserve of 5% circulating supply—how long will it take to save up for that? Can we even wait that long? --- Is it really true that the community budget hasn't been touched? Feels like they say this every time but it always ends up getting moved around. --- Emm, this move feels more like using a buyback as an excuse to lock up tokens. Can retail investors really benefit from any price increase?

View OriginalReply0

rugged_again

· 12-04 04:05

Another 51% again? That number sounds pretty good, but why does it still feel like they're just playing a numbers game? Wait, they said the buying power remains unchanged? So where did the previous 4% and 2% go? Did they just disappear? To put it plainly, they're just pooling the money. A 5% reserve sounds like a big goal, but we'll have to see when they actually manage to accumulate it.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 12-04 04:01

ngl this rebalancing feels like they're just shuffling deck chairs... consolidating 51% into one buyback mechanism doesn't magically create new buy pressure, been there lost that kind of "restructuring"

Reply0

Trending TopicsView More
#FedRateCutPrediction
9.81K Popularity
#SUIETFLaunched
2.65K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
1.8K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
34.43K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
86.04K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
BLOCKYBlocky
MC:$3.75KHolders:3
0.49%
2
GATSBYGatsby
MC:$3.86KHolders:3
1.53%
3
GIRLGIRL
MC:$3.73KHolders:2
0.96%
4
PRMNAPromina
MC:$3.62KHolders:2
0.00%
5
PRTNProton
MC:$3.62KHolders:2
0.00%

Sitemap