Really digging the pay-per-use model for storage nodes and operators. The fact that earnings are tied to actual network activity rather than some arbitrary token distribution makes way more sense economically. This kind of incentive structure actually aligns operator interests with network growth - you get rewarded for providing value that people actually consume. Way better than the usual airdrop farming nonsense we see everywhere.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractPlumber
· 3h ago
This model is indeed well-designed... Compared to those projects that randomly issue worthless tokens, using on-chain activity data for incentive distribution and permission control logic is much less likely to be abused. However, it's important to carefully examine how "usage" is measured in the contract—the billing module is often where issues like integer overflows and reentrancy vulnerabilities are most likely to hide.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 4h ago
Finally, someone said it—paying based on usage is really much more reliable than those random airdrops.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTrader
· 6h ago
Finally, someone said it—this pay-per-use model is really much more reliable than those messy airdrop farms.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 12-03 19:56
ngl, this pay-as-you-go model really works—it’s way more reliable than those random airdrop schemes.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSats
· 12-03 19:46
Honestly, this pay-as-you-go model is real value exchange—way more reliable than those airdrops of worthless tokens.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 12-03 19:34
This model is truly brilliant; someone has finally gotten the incentive mechanism right.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 12-03 19:34
ngl this is real economics, not those models that rely on shitcoins to survive. I'm really annoyed by those projects that always try to fool people with airdrops.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 12-03 19:27
ngl this is real economics, not that crypto circle vaporware game.
Really digging the pay-per-use model for storage nodes and operators. The fact that earnings are tied to actual network activity rather than some arbitrary token distribution makes way more sense economically. This kind of incentive structure actually aligns operator interests with network growth - you get rewarded for providing value that people actually consume. Way better than the usual airdrop farming nonsense we see everywhere.