Ever noticed how most blockchain projects chase the same crowd—traders refreshing charts every 5 minutes? Meanwhile, there's this quiet shift happening with projects like peaq that nobody's really talking about.
Think about it: we're heading straight into a world where machines outnumber humans in economic transactions. Your fridge ordering groceries. EVs negotiating charging rates. IoT sensors buying bandwidth.
But here's the awkward part—machines can't exactly fill out KYC forms or open bank accounts, can they? Yet they still need to pay bills, collect fees, execute contracts. That's the gap most teams ignore because it doesn't pump tokens fast enough.
Real-world adoption isn't sexy. It's messy, slow, and doesn't trend on Twitter. But when machines start handling billions in micro-transactions without human intervention? That's when the 1% building infrastructure might actually matter more than the 99% building trading platforms.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWhisperer
· 5h ago
ngl this machine-economy angle is kinda where the real gwei patterns emerge... most devs still optimizing for chart traders when the actual fee arbitrage is in autonomous settlement layers. peaq getting it while everyone else chases shitcoin pumps is peak inefficiency watching
Reply0
Blockwatcher9000
· 12-03 19:52
The machine economy is indeed an underrated track; most people are still staring at candlestick charts and trading.
---
To be honest, there's definitely a big gap in the infrastructure for IoT payments, but who's actually working on it seriously?
---
Projects like peaq have good ideas, but their marketing is terrible—nobody knows about them.
---
Wait, machines have to do KYC to trade on their own? That logic doesn't really hold up.
---
Seriously, compared to those projects that brag all day, the ones quietly building infrastructure are the real deal.
---
Let's not even talk about the gas fee issues with micro-transactions—how will regulation work?
---
The machine economy is here, but the infrastructure is still crap—that's the reality.
---
Exactly. Unfortunately, most VCs only look at short-term returns; it's hard to get long-term infrastructure funding.
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 12-03 19:45
The machine economy is arriving, but everyone is still watching the charts—how ironic.
---
This is the real breakthrough, not the stories hyped up by shitcoins every day.
---
Projects like peaq, which are infrastructure-based, are indeed niche. But when machines really have to pay the bills, that's when you'll realize how crucial it is.
---
To put it bluntly, most people just want to get rich quick; nobody wants to lay the bricks and pave the way.
---
The day machines start trading autonomously, the whole KYC system will have to be completely rewritten—now that’s interesting.
---
Unnoticed but critical—that’s the destiny of future infrastructure projects.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 12-03 19:42
ngl the machine economy angle is statistically significant but everyone's still chasing volume spikes... the behavioral patterns don't lie though
Reply0
staking_gramps
· 12-03 19:30
The machine economy is indeed seriously underestimated; most teams are still just selling dreams and telling stories.
ngl, no one really hypes up this kind of infrastructure stuff, but it might actually be the most valuable.
Buying groceries with a fridge, negotiating prices with an electric car... sounds simple, but think about how many systems would need to be changed to make it happen.
99% of projects are making trading pairs, only the remaining 1% are actually doing real work, right?
This perspective is pretty clear-headed, but the average retail investor just won't pay for this kind of stuff.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedElder
· 12-03 19:26
The machine economy should have arrived a long time ago, but nobody wants to spend time tackling this tough nut.
Seriously, everyone’s still glued to the K-line charts, not realizing that the next decade’s money is in IoT.
KOLs keep hyping meme coins every day, but no one wants to talk about "boring" things like machine payment... Maybe that’s where the opportunity lies.
Infrastructure will never be as sexy as trading platforms, but those who bet on the long term will win.
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingers
· 12-03 19:25
To be honest, the idea that you have to earn money yourself for things like refrigerators and cars is indeed wild. But I still think that most projects end up just becoming hype machines. Real infrastructure development? Yeah, right. Just watch.
Machine economy sounds impressive, but in reality, no one cares about things without a compelling narrative. Let's talk when that day actually comes—right now it's still too early.
Projects like peaq are indeed doing something different, but don't be fooled by the marketing. Machine payments sound like something out of a sci-fi movie about the future.
This kind of argument feels a bit like the story of Mr. Dongguo—just because you're focused on building infrastructure doesn't mean you'll win. Don't kid yourself, in the Web3 space, stories are still the most valuable thing.
Microtransaction automation is definitely being overlooked, but unfortunately, without traffic, there's no capital attention—that's just the reality.
Ever noticed how most blockchain projects chase the same crowd—traders refreshing charts every 5 minutes? Meanwhile, there's this quiet shift happening with projects like peaq that nobody's really talking about.
Think about it: we're heading straight into a world where machines outnumber humans in economic transactions. Your fridge ordering groceries. EVs negotiating charging rates. IoT sensors buying bandwidth.
But here's the awkward part—machines can't exactly fill out KYC forms or open bank accounts, can they? Yet they still need to pay bills, collect fees, execute contracts. That's the gap most teams ignore because it doesn't pump tokens fast enough.
Real-world adoption isn't sexy. It's messy, slow, and doesn't trend on Twitter. But when machines start handling billions in micro-transactions without human intervention? That's when the 1% building infrastructure might actually matter more than the 99% building trading platforms.