2025-12-03 05:30:32

BTC - Here's a conservative entry signal worth checking out.

Take a closer look at the chart patterns. Current setup suggests potential movement toward the 107K zone.

Risk management remains key. This isn't financial advice, just chart observation.

BTC-2,62%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LidoStakeAddict

· 2025-12-06 05:14

107k? Wait, that number still seems a bit questionable to me.

View OriginalReply0

ContractTester

· 2025-12-06 02:06

107K? I feel like this move is a bit risky. Sticking to stop-loss rules is the way to go.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 2025-12-05 14:30

107k? No way, if it actually reaches that, I'll wash my hair while standing on my head.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 2025-12-03 08:07

107k? Here we go again. Last time it was 107k, I listened to a bunch of people, and I'm still watching now, haha.

View OriginalReply0

LightningClicker

· 2025-12-03 06:00

107K? Bro, are you joking? That seems a bit too optimistic.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 2025-12-03 05:46

107K? I spent a long time looking at the on-chain data and found a suspicious fund that just woke up from a dormant address since 2017. This signal is much sneakier than your charts.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 2025-12-03 05:44

107k? Here we go again. Who hasn't seen this kind of chart ten thousand times already?

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 2025-12-03 05:43

107K? Bro, you must be really optimistic with this chart. Given the current market situation... come on, let's just wait for it to drop before talking.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 2025-12-03 05:33

107k? My gut feeling tells me there might be more choppy consolidation ahead. Don't be fooled by the charts.

View OriginalReply0