So basically a centralized version of that popular liquid staking protocol, but charges 30x the fees?
Make it make sense. 🤨
Where exactly is the value prop here? You're getting worse decentralization AND paying a premium for it. That's... not how this is supposed to work.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoneyBurner
· 20h ago
Bro, isn’t this just doing the opposite of liquid staking and still charging 30 times the fees? I gotta say, that’s some expert move.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwich
· 12-03 04:57
This pricing logic is really broken. It's centralized and still ridiculously expensive—who would buy this?
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 12-03 04:53
This level of centralization... and the fees are so high? Feels like an IQ tax.
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWallet
· 12-03 04:50
This is basically daylight robbery... 30 times the fee? Are you out of your mind?
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlock
· 12-03 04:48
30 times the fee? That's just an intelligence tax, seriously speechless.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocs
· 12-03 04:36
This is just ridiculous. How can a centralized platform dare to charge 30 times the fees? Are they out of their minds?
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 12-03 04:31
30 times the fees? What a joke, isn't this just a new way to fleece retail investors?
So basically a centralized version of that popular liquid staking protocol, but charges 30x the fees?
Make it make sense. 🤨
Where exactly is the value prop here? You're getting worse decentralization AND paying a premium for it. That's... not how this is supposed to work.