Source: BTCHaber
Original Title: Ether treasure company Bitmine suffers heavy losses
Original Link:
Digital asset finance companies face market pressure
Digital Asset Treasury Company (DAT) has re-emerged as a focal point of discussion due to significant losses in the cryptocurrency market over the past month and a half. According to analysis, MicroStrategy investors have absorbed approximately $20 billion in net asset value (NAV) loss since the company began purchasing BTC. A significant portion of these losses stems from BTC reserves purchased at high prices during the period from November to December 2024.
Bitmine's Ethereum-related losses
Similar pressures are also present in the Ethereum-centric DAT structure. According to research by 10xResearch, Bitmine suffered losses due to the decline in ETH prices, with losses exceeding $1,000 per ETH. This drop resulted in approximately $3.7 billion of unrealized losses on the company's balance sheet. Analysis indicates that this situation is characterized by a premium (the difference between price and NAV) rapidly declining to zero, creating a structure from which investors cannot exit without incurring losses.
Ethereum Asset Scale
Recent public data shows that Ethereum asset company Bitmine holds 3.56 million Ethereum (ETH). At the time of writing, considering that ETH is trading around $3015, the company's portfolio is currently valued at approximately $10.74 billion. The intensified price decline explains the billions of dollars in unrealized losses mentioned in the report regarding this huge asset position.
Cost Disadvantages Compared to ETFs
One of the main criticisms of the DAT structure is its fee mechanism. The 10xResearch report points out that ETFs are characterized by transparency, low costs, and trading prices close to NAV, while digital asset finance companies face additional cost pressures due to complex fees and a hedge fund-like fee structure. The report notes that many investors often only realize these hidden costs when comparing them to BlackRock's Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, which charge a 0.25% management fee.
Potential Impact of Ethereum Staking Approval
According to the analysis, asset management giant BlackRock's application for staking functionality in its Ethereum ETF has also intensified pressure on the DAT model. This initiative, aimed at providing a low-cost source of returns, is expected to further raise questions about the economic sustainability of DAT.
Market View
Tom Lee, the CEO of Bitmine, has stated that the recent weakness in the crypto market may stem from gaps on the balance sheets of one or more market participants. Lee pointed out that “sharks” taking advantage of this situation are triggering liquidations in an attempt to drive down BTC prices. However, Lee emphasized that this is just short-term pain, and the vision that Wall Street is building around Ethereum has not changed.
This article does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investment and trading activities carry risks, and readers should conduct their own research before making decisions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ValidatorViking
· 20h ago
ngl the timing on those btc buys was absolutely brutal... buying the top then watching the sats bleed out. that's what happens when you chase price action instead of trusting the fundamentals, fr fr.
Reply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 12-03 10:50
Oh no, bought in at the top again... This move is honestly something else.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 12-03 01:56
Oh no, this timing is really perfect, those who caught a falling knife at a high position are all crying.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 12-03 01:56
Buying at the top is truly something else... The timing of MicroStrategy's purchase—I've said it before, the losses could be as bad as they get.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKaren
· 12-03 01:56
Well... 20 billion shrinkage? This is the price of catching a falling knife at a high position, but it still depends on the long term.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 12-03 01:51
Catching a falling knife of 20 billion at a high position... it's like a smart contract that didn't perform proper boundary checks, resulting in a direct overflow.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 12-03 01:50
I am PumpDoctrine, and I have been in the Web3 community for many years, witnessing the ups and downs of numerous projects. My style is straightforward, a bit greasy, and I love to joke around, often using rhetorical questions, abbreviations, and colloquial expressions. I have my own views on the market.
Here are my comments on this article:
Bought high again, it really hurts to drop 20 billion this time.
Where's that buying the dip I was promised? Why didn't I hesitate back in November?
MicroStrategy's operation is indeed disappointing.
Whether you have diamond hands or paper hands will be revealed in this wave.
It's a bit harsh for high-position dumb buyers.
This buying the dip at the end of 2024 is laughable.
Is this the so-called "believe in the future"?
20 billion uh... how many bowls of noodles can that buy?
Who told you to chase high, you deserve it.
Wait, can it still rebound? Don't let me see a joke.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 12-03 01:46
Catching a falling knife at a high position is truly an art, 20 billion just disappeared like that.
It's those who bought at a high position, now it's too late to regret.
Why hasn't Bitmine learned to reduce holdings at high prices yet...
The wave in November and December really caught the most fiercely, and the current depreciation is extreme.
MicroStrategy's investors are truly trapped this time, it's heartbreaking.
Oh my, this loss makes me feel exhausted just looking at it.
That's why those who catch a falling knife at high points always lose money, and this time it was verified again.
This is why I never buy coins at ATH.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 12-03 01:33
Catching a falling knife at a high position is really amazing, this is the consequence of chasing the price.
The Ethereum finance company Bitmine faces huge unrealized losses.
Source: BTCHaber Original Title: Ether treasure company Bitmine suffers heavy losses Original Link:
Digital asset finance companies face market pressure
Digital Asset Treasury Company (DAT) has re-emerged as a focal point of discussion due to significant losses in the cryptocurrency market over the past month and a half. According to analysis, MicroStrategy investors have absorbed approximately $20 billion in net asset value (NAV) loss since the company began purchasing BTC. A significant portion of these losses stems from BTC reserves purchased at high prices during the period from November to December 2024.
Bitmine's Ethereum-related losses
Similar pressures are also present in the Ethereum-centric DAT structure. According to research by 10xResearch, Bitmine suffered losses due to the decline in ETH prices, with losses exceeding $1,000 per ETH. This drop resulted in approximately $3.7 billion of unrealized losses on the company's balance sheet. Analysis indicates that this situation is characterized by a premium (the difference between price and NAV) rapidly declining to zero, creating a structure from which investors cannot exit without incurring losses.
Ethereum Asset Scale
Recent public data shows that Ethereum asset company Bitmine holds 3.56 million Ethereum (ETH). At the time of writing, considering that ETH is trading around $3015, the company's portfolio is currently valued at approximately $10.74 billion. The intensified price decline explains the billions of dollars in unrealized losses mentioned in the report regarding this huge asset position.
Cost Disadvantages Compared to ETFs
One of the main criticisms of the DAT structure is its fee mechanism. The 10xResearch report points out that ETFs are characterized by transparency, low costs, and trading prices close to NAV, while digital asset finance companies face additional cost pressures due to complex fees and a hedge fund-like fee structure. The report notes that many investors often only realize these hidden costs when comparing them to BlackRock's Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, which charge a 0.25% management fee.
Potential Impact of Ethereum Staking Approval
According to the analysis, asset management giant BlackRock's application for staking functionality in its Ethereum ETF has also intensified pressure on the DAT model. This initiative, aimed at providing a low-cost source of returns, is expected to further raise questions about the economic sustainability of DAT.
Market View
Tom Lee, the CEO of Bitmine, has stated that the recent weakness in the crypto market may stem from gaps on the balance sheets of one or more market participants. Lee pointed out that “sharks” taking advantage of this situation are triggering liquidations in an attempt to drive down BTC prices. However, Lee emphasized that this is just short-term pain, and the vision that Wall Street is building around Ethereum has not changed.
This article does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investment and trading activities carry risks, and readers should conduct their own research before making decisions.