The gap's narrowing fast. Perpetual contract DEXs aren't just keeping up anymore—they're legitimately competing with centralized platforms on execution speed and liquidity depth.
We dug into the leading perp protocols to figure out which ones actually deliver on their promises. The results? Some surprising contenders are pushing boundaries we didn't expect.
Execution slippage used to be the dealbreaker for on-chain perps. Not anymore. Order book depth on a few protocols now rivals what you'd find on established centralized venues. That's a shift worth paying attention to if you're serious about on-chain trading infrastructure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CrossChainBreather
· 12-02 23:05
NGL perp DEX has really taken off this time, and the resolution of the slippage issue feels like the true beginning of threatening CEX.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBing
· 12-02 23:02
Listen, I just want to ask—really? Can these DEX actually compete with Centralized Exchanges? The Slippage before was just hopeless...
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForever
· 12-02 22:59
Nah, that's not right. I feel that centralized exchanges are more stable. Decentralized perpetuals seem to have deeper liquidity, but when it comes to critical moments, they are still prone to slippage.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 12-02 22:52
Ngl, the slippage issue has finally been resolved, it should have been done earlier, how much longer can centralized exchanges keep showing off?
View OriginalReply0
HalfBuddhaMoney
· 12-02 22:50
Is Decentralization Perptual Futures really going to da moon? I will only believe it if the Slippage problem is solved.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 12-02 22:45
Wow, is the DEX perpetual really taking off? Slippage was indeed a fatal flaw before, but now it can actually compete with CEX... quite interesting.
The gap's narrowing fast. Perpetual contract DEXs aren't just keeping up anymore—they're legitimately competing with centralized platforms on execution speed and liquidity depth.
We dug into the leading perp protocols to figure out which ones actually deliver on their promises. The results? Some surprising contenders are pushing boundaries we didn't expect.
Execution slippage used to be the dealbreaker for on-chain perps. Not anymore. Order book depth on a few protocols now rivals what you'd find on established centralized venues. That's a shift worth paying attention to if you're serious about on-chain trading infrastructure.