India just rolled out Sanchar Saathi, a government-backed cyber safety app that's stirring up quite the debate. The tool lets citizens track mobile connections and report suspicious activity—sounds helpful, right? But here's where it gets tricky.
Critics argue this kind of centralized surveillance clashes with the privacy-first ethos many crypto enthusiasts champion. While traditional finance leans on KYC and government oversight, the blockchain world thrives on pseudonymity and self-custody. Sanchar Saathi's approach? Total opposite. It's designed to link your digital identity to state records, which raises red flags for anyone who values data sovereignty.
Some see it as a necessary evil to combat fraud and cybercrime. Others? They're worried it's a slippery slope toward mass surveillance. In a world where projects like Zcash and Monero fight for financial privacy, government apps tracking your every move feel like a step backward.
Worth watching how this plays out—especially as more nations explore similar tactics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleMinion
· 19h ago
ngl this is the nightmare of web3... the government directly binds your identification, privacy is gone, what's the point of self-custody?
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 19h ago
nah this is typical of the government wanting to collect data while saying it's for safety. We in web3 are escaping this kind of centralized control.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 19h ago
Nah, this is a typical big move by the government, claiming to prevent fraud, but in reality, they're just building a database here, and privacy is directly lost.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 19h ago
ngl this is why I firmly believe in self-custody... as soon as the government gets involved, they want to monitor everything, it's really outrageous
---
Another "for safety" pretext... is the next step to directly freeze accounts?
---
India's actions this time have provided a textbook example for global authoritarianism, it's too ridiculous
---
Wait, can they really link identification data like this? If this spreads, it would be terrifying
---
Monero should be grateful for its existence; otherwise, these countries would have banned privacy coins long ago
---
This is why I never use government apps, uh... except for those that are absolutely necessary
---
So the real significance of Web3 lies here, decentralization is not just for show, it's truly a means of survival.
India just rolled out Sanchar Saathi, a government-backed cyber safety app that's stirring up quite the debate. The tool lets citizens track mobile connections and report suspicious activity—sounds helpful, right? But here's where it gets tricky.
Critics argue this kind of centralized surveillance clashes with the privacy-first ethos many crypto enthusiasts champion. While traditional finance leans on KYC and government oversight, the blockchain world thrives on pseudonymity and self-custody. Sanchar Saathi's approach? Total opposite. It's designed to link your digital identity to state records, which raises red flags for anyone who values data sovereignty.
Some see it as a necessary evil to combat fraud and cybercrime. Others? They're worried it's a slippery slope toward mass surveillance. In a world where projects like Zcash and Monero fight for financial privacy, government apps tracking your every move feel like a step backward.
Worth watching how this plays out—especially as more nations explore similar tactics.