I have seen a real case: 1500U principal, rolled to 28,000 in two months, with zero Get Liquidated throughout.



His playing style actually comes down to three main moves -

**Capital Block Management**: The principal is hard split into three parts: 500U specifically for short-term trading opportunities, 500U reserved for trend markets, and the remaining 500U as a buffer. The core of this tactic is "never put all your chips in one basket"; surviving is more important than betting correctly.

**Wait for trends to form before taking action**: During a period of sideways fluctuations, just hang back and observe; wait until the direction is clear before entering the market. Once profits exceed 20% of the principal, immediately take 30% off the table — don't expect to catch the top in one go; realizing profits at various stages is the right approach.

**Discipline Mechanical Execution**: Cut positions directly when losing 2%, reduce positions to lock in profits when gaining 4%, and never increase positions to average down in a loss. It sounds simple, but not many can strictly execute it; ironically, this "stupid method" often leads to the longest survival.

How can small capital players replicate?

Focus on three key points: diversify to protect your capital (don’t concentrate your fire), patiently follow trends (don’t chase after rising or falling prices), and stick to discipline (2% stop loss / 4% take profit / avoid averaging down). Small funds shouldn’t fear a low starting point, but they should fear acting chaotically without a plan; only with solid risk control can they gradually grow.

The operational framework is: divide the funds into three parts (500U each) → profit trigger line (take 30% when exceeding 20%) → stop loss and take profit iron rules (2%/4%).

Recently focused on the target: #美联储恢复降息进程 $pippin $UAI, but remember, any target should be combined with risk control discipline.
PIPPIN-23,03%
TRADOOR-5,85%
UAI-12,23%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LightningSentryvip
· 2025-12-03 21:26
It's true, risk control must be enforced ruthlessly. Most people end up losing because they keep averaging down and adding to their positions.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStakervip
· 2025-12-03 05:48
Damn, this set of rules is really tough. Not averaging down seems simple, but in reality, 99% of people can't do it—I’ve messed up myself before.
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notablevip
· 2025-12-02 17:31
That's right, small investors are most afraid of making impulsive trades, and this guy's methodology is indeed solid.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007vip
· 2025-12-02 17:16
Really, reducing position by 2% and reducing position by 4% sounds so simple, yet why is it still a loss?
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfervip
· 2025-12-02 17:13
Discipline is really the biggest test for a person; cutting positions at 2% sounds painful, but it helps you survive much longer.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTaxvip
· 2025-12-02 17:13
To be honest, after hearing this trap theory many times, the key is still to really endure a few drawdowns; otherwise, it's meaningless to talk about it on paper.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegrettervip
· 2025-12-02 17:03
In simple terms, being alive is more important than making quick money, and this trap framework is indeed sound.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)