There's this weekly feature that calls out what they're labeling the "media offender." Gets refreshed regularly, apparently.
Scroll through and you'll see the breakdown: which outlet ran the story, who wrote it, what they're being called out for. Then it contrasts the article's claims against what's supposedly the real story, wrapping up with the main points worth noting.
Interesting approach to fact-checking in this space. Makes you wonder how they're picking these cases and what criteria they're using.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeKingNFT
· 13h ago
This "Media Sinner" weekly really needs a close look... on-chain data might be more honest than mainstream media.
View OriginalReply0
SorryRugPulled
· 13h ago
This "Slap in the Face Weekly" trap is not bad, but why are the selection criteria so strange?
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 13h ago
In simple terms, it's just another fact-checking project, but who understands the logic behind these case selections...
View OriginalReply0
VibesOverCharts
· 13h ago
Uh, this trap review mechanism feels so familiar... I always feel like the topic selection is a bit subjective.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromise
· 13h ago
In simple terms, it's selective fact-checking, and it's really unclear who sets the standards.
There's this weekly feature that calls out what they're labeling the "media offender." Gets refreshed regularly, apparently.
Scroll through and you'll see the breakdown: which outlet ran the story, who wrote it, what they're being called out for. Then it contrasts the article's claims against what's supposedly the real story, wrapping up with the main points worth noting.
Interesting approach to fact-checking in this space. Makes you wonder how they're picking these cases and what criteria they're using.