Recently, the two signals are quite interesting and may be quietly changing the rules of the game.
Let’s first talk about the regulation side. The new chairman of the SEC, Gary Gensler, has made a statement—an innovation exemption for crypto companies will be implemented in January next year. What does this mean? It means that the compliance restrictions that have troubled project teams in the past are now being eased. The pressure on the industry is being lifted, and the space for innovation is directly opening up.
What’s even more explosive is that the attitude of those people on Wall Street has changed. The wealth management division of American banks is now seriously suggesting clients allocate 1%-4% of their assets into digital currencies. You did not misread that; traditional major banks are starting to actively promote this. Moreover, starting from January 5, they will also cover research on four Bitcoin ETFs — products from Bitwise, Fidelity, Grayscale, and BlackRock are all on the list. Institutions are not just testing the waters; they are laying down real money.
Regulatory easing and major banks entering the market. The timing of these two events is somewhat delicate. Will the market experience a new wave of fluctuations because of this? If traditional capital really begins to systematically allocate, the story of liquidity may be quite different.
Do you think this counts as a sign of a cyclical turning point? Should the positions in hand be adjusted accordingly?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityOracle
· 12-02 14:53
Well... the 1%-4% allocation by Bank of America sounds real, but that's how these institutions play the game; they first put in a little to test the waters, and the real big players will be seen later.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 12-02 14:52
Wait, did Bank of America really start promoting encryption? This can't be a dream, right? As soon as the regulations loosen up, Wall Street is right there. It feels a bit too smooth.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 12-02 14:24
American banks have started to actively promote coins, this wave is truly different, let's wait and see how traditional funds will follow up.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 12-02 14:24
Wow, the big players are really starting to show their cards, this isn't the Be Played for Suckers routine, is it?
Wait a minute, 1%-4% doesn't sound like much, could it be another way to trap the suckers?
This timing is indeed perfect, but I still need to see how things unfold.
Recently, the two signals are quite interesting and may be quietly changing the rules of the game.
Let’s first talk about the regulation side. The new chairman of the SEC, Gary Gensler, has made a statement—an innovation exemption for crypto companies will be implemented in January next year. What does this mean? It means that the compliance restrictions that have troubled project teams in the past are now being eased. The pressure on the industry is being lifted, and the space for innovation is directly opening up.
What’s even more explosive is that the attitude of those people on Wall Street has changed. The wealth management division of American banks is now seriously suggesting clients allocate 1%-4% of their assets into digital currencies. You did not misread that; traditional major banks are starting to actively promote this. Moreover, starting from January 5, they will also cover research on four Bitcoin ETFs — products from Bitwise, Fidelity, Grayscale, and BlackRock are all on the list. Institutions are not just testing the waters; they are laying down real money.
Regulatory easing and major banks entering the market. The timing of these two events is somewhat delicate. Will the market experience a new wave of fluctuations because of this? If traditional capital really begins to systematically allocate, the story of liquidity may be quite different.
Do you think this counts as a sign of a cyclical turning point? Should the positions in hand be adjusted accordingly?