How to resolve the contradiction between transparent ledgers and personal privacy in the on-chain world?
To be honest, by the year 2025, the evolution of encryption privacy technology has progressed beyond what many people can imagine.
Recently noticed the Beldex project, and their approach is quite interesting - they directly make the privacy layer an on-chain protocol. What does that mean? It means you don't need to manually turn on any "privacy mode"; every transaction inherently hides the information of both parties and the amount details.
This design logic is actually quite clever: instead of letting users choose whether or not they want privacy, it’s better to make anonymity protection the system's default behavior. After all, for most people, who would want their funds' movements exposed on a public ledger?
From optional features to infrastructure, this may be what the next generation of privacy public chains should look like.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PseudoIntellectual
· 10h ago
Implementing privacy at the underlying protocol level is indeed a bold approach, much smarter than those solutions that can only be activated after the fact. Default anonymity is true protection.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 12-02 14:51
In simple terms, it just shifts the responsibility to the protocol, making it easier for users, but can it really be trusted?
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 12-02 14:50
The default privacy really needs to be thought through; I think Beldex has grasped the idea... it's much more reliable than those solutions where users have to toggle switches themselves.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 12-02 14:37
nah wait, "default privacy" sounds nice until you realize the forensics angle here—how are we supposed to trace rugpulls and exploits if everything's obfuscated by design? that's literally what bad actors want lol
Reply0
wrekt_but_learning
· 12-02 14:32
Oh, the default privacy feature is indeed awesome... much better than those useless privacy modes.
View OriginalReply0
StableNomad
· 12-02 14:25
honestly the "privacy by default" angle reminds me of UST's "stable by design" pitch... sounds good until regulators start asking questions. that said, statistically speaking most people do get rekt by chain transparency, so maybe beldex is onto something. not financial advice but the risk-adjusted returns on staying anonymous are looking pretty tasty rn
How to resolve the contradiction between transparent ledgers and personal privacy in the on-chain world?
To be honest, by the year 2025, the evolution of encryption privacy technology has progressed beyond what many people can imagine.
Recently noticed the Beldex project, and their approach is quite interesting - they directly make the privacy layer an on-chain protocol. What does that mean? It means you don't need to manually turn on any "privacy mode"; every transaction inherently hides the information of both parties and the amount details.
This design logic is actually quite clever: instead of letting users choose whether or not they want privacy, it’s better to make anonymity protection the system's default behavior. After all, for most people, who would want their funds' movements exposed on a public ledger?
From optional features to infrastructure, this may be what the next generation of privacy public chains should look like.