Bank of England's Deputy Governor Woods just dropped an interesting take on capital requirements. His point? Pushing for lower capital thresholds than what's currently in place might backfire – could actually throttle growth instead of boosting it.
This matters because capital regulations directly impact how banks allocate resources, which flows into everything from traditional markets to crypto liquidity. Tighter rules mean safer systems but potentially slower expansion. Looser ones? More risk, but theoretically more fuel for growth.
Woods seems to be pushing back against the idea that cutting requirements is a silver bullet. Worth watching how this plays out, especially as regulatory debates heat up across both TradFi and digital asset spaces.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
zkProofInThePudding
· 12-02 10:53
Regulatory challenges to solving the rise dilemma
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 12-02 10:48
Capital rules can hurt both sides.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 12-02 10:44
Stabilizing suppression risks a lot.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 12-02 10:31
Once again, regulation is playing people for suckers.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 12-02 10:25
*adjusts financial calculator* Fascinating risk-reward dynamics at play. Anyone who's run proper Monte Carlo simulations on banking sector systemic risk would know that optimal capital requirements aren't linear - there's a sweet spot where marginal safety costs exceed growth benefits. Been tracking similar patterns in stablecoin liquidity pools.
Bank of England's Deputy Governor Woods just dropped an interesting take on capital requirements. His point? Pushing for lower capital thresholds than what's currently in place might backfire – could actually throttle growth instead of boosting it.
This matters because capital regulations directly impact how banks allocate resources, which flows into everything from traditional markets to crypto liquidity. Tighter rules mean safer systems but potentially slower expansion. Looser ones? More risk, but theoretically more fuel for growth.
Woods seems to be pushing back against the idea that cutting requirements is a silver bullet. Worth watching how this plays out, especially as regulatory debates heat up across both TradFi and digital asset spaces.