Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Back in 1983, Apple was just a small company that crawled out of a garage. But Jobs' understanding of stock Options at that time could still outshine a lot of publicly listed company CEOs today.



This foresight is not just talk—he understood long ago that real motivation comes not from salaries, but from making the team a community of shared interests. Decades have passed, yet how many traditional enterprises still rely on the outdated fixed salary model, resulting in employees being disengaged and executives cashing out and leaving.

Think about the Token allocation of current Web3 projects; doesn’t it feel somewhat familiar? Core team lockup, community incentives, long-term value binding — essentially, they are all addressing the same issue: how to make participants truly care about the future of the project.

Some things were seen through by people forty years ago.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTherapistvip
· 14h ago
The stuff from Jobs is still being used today; Web3 is just an old story in a new wrapper, and there are very few projects that can actually be executed.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidatorvip
· 19h ago
Jobs’ stuff was truly amazing, but honestly, not many of these current Web3 projects have really grasped the essence. Really? Token lockup is just another way to fleece retail investors. At the end of the day, incentives come down to execution. No matter how good the model looks on paper, it’s useless without solid execution. Some projects claim to be community-driven but decisions are still centralized. It’s a joke. Back in Jobs’ era, there was real belief. Now it’s mostly just fundraising and telling stories. Binding interests sounds great, but if the team runs away and the token goes to zero, it’s all for nothing. True, the old traditional business models are played out, but copying Web3 isn’t necessarily going to save them either.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobiavip
· 12-03 06:27
Alright, Jobs’ approach is definitely impressive. But most Web3 projects nowadays are just copying the surface, what about real execution? Apple succeeded because they actually built something. Now, a bunch of crypto projects just hype up locking tokens and incentives, but in the end it’s all a mess. There’s still a big difference.
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStakingvip
· 12-02 07:49
Steve Jobs' options logic was indeed brilliant, but now many Web3 projects engage in token distribution not necessarily by learning from him; sometimes it's simply because they don't have money to pay salaries, haha. --- This logic has become a joke when applied to many projects today; lock-up positions are one thing, but a Rug Pull can happen in an instant. --- Options incentives and token incentives may seem similar, but the actual differences are huge; one is backed by real assets, while the other relies entirely on faith. --- I agree, aligning interests is indeed the strongest incentive, but the premise is that the project really has a future. --- The reason options were valuable during Jobs' time was that Apple actually delivered results; in contrast, most Web3 projects today use tokens as cheap "incentive" tools. --- The core issue is still trust; no matter how good the distribution mechanism is, if the project party cashes out and does a Rug Pull, everything is in vain. --- To put it bluntly, it still comes down to the team's character; the distribution model is just surface-level work.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 12-02 07:43
Jobs' move is truly brilliant; how many people can think of this depth now?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)