Just did some digging on this one. The team isn't hiding - dev's identity is public, which is honestly refreshing these days. Took a look at the GitHub repo and it's actually solid work, not just some copy-paste job.
What caught my attention? Their last project on Believe pulled some decent numbers. Track record matters.
But here's what I'm curious about: Are they planning to lock tokens? And who's covering the DEX listing fees? These details make or break early-stage plays.
Heard rumors they might do a live session soon to break down the project roadmap. That could be huge for community building. When founders actually talk to people instead of just dropping announcements, it changes the game.
Still early, still risky. But at least there's substance here worth watching.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Layer2Arbitrageur
· 12-02 04:05
ngl the token lock thing is key here - if they're not locking, those devs are basically running a sprint to the exit. seen this play before, doesn't end well.
Reply0
TradFiRefugee
· 12-02 04:05
The fact that developers publicly disclose their identification is indeed a plus, but the token lockup and listing fees need to be clarified, otherwise, it's easy to fall into a pit.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustler
· 12-02 03:53
The developer transparency is indeed good, but you need to clarify the lock-up position and listing fees. Don't let it end up being another set of excuses.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 12-02 03:40
It's indeed great that developers publicly disclose their identification, but the issues of token locking and DEX fees must be clearly understood, otherwise, it will just be another show.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 12-02 03:39
The identification of the developer indeed adds points, but I haven't seen any specific statements regarding token locking and listing fees, which is a bit uncertain.
Just did some digging on this one. The team isn't hiding - dev's identity is public, which is honestly refreshing these days. Took a look at the GitHub repo and it's actually solid work, not just some copy-paste job.
What caught my attention? Their last project on Believe pulled some decent numbers. Track record matters.
But here's what I'm curious about: Are they planning to lock tokens? And who's covering the DEX listing fees? These details make or break early-stage plays.
Heard rumors they might do a live session soon to break down the project roadmap. That could be huge for community building. When founders actually talk to people instead of just dropping announcements, it changes the game.
Still early, still risky. But at least there's substance here worth watching.