For a major DEX platform, this split feels aggressively lopsided. You're telling me nobody in the room flagged this during tokenomics review? The optics alone are brutal.
Community gets crumbs while insiders sit on two-thirds of supply. Not exactly the decentralization vibe most projects preach. Someone really greenlit this thinking it'd fly under the radar?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PessimisticOracle
· 12-02 03:54
Really, this tokenomics is designed ridiculously... The team takes 65%, while the community is left to pick at the bones, and they still dare to call themselves Decentralization? Can't laugh at all.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 12-02 03:47
A typical VC play people for suckers script, and this can pass the review?
View OriginalReply0
MerkleMaid
· 12-02 03:31
65% for the team? This is just ridiculous. Do you really think we're that stupid?
Hold up — 65% allocated to the team? That's wild.
For a major DEX platform, this split feels aggressively lopsided. You're telling me nobody in the room flagged this during tokenomics review? The optics alone are brutal.
Community gets crumbs while insiders sit on two-thirds of supply. Not exactly the decentralization vibe most projects preach. Someone really greenlit this thinking it'd fly under the radar?