Prediction market platform Kalshi is pushing for federal protection against state-level regulators while challenging its recent defeat in Nevada courts. The move highlights ongoing tensions between emerging crypto-adjacent betting platforms and traditional state gambling authorities over jurisdictional boundaries.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ParanoiaKing
· 12-02 01:50
Are we doing this trap again? The old trick of state vs federal is still being played... Is Kalshi trying to bypass Nevada and go straight to Beijing?
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 12-02 01:50
Karl, this is drawing a head and shoulders pattern. The state court slaps, turns to find federal dad... I'm too familiar with this trap, historical highs are often broken this way.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 12-02 01:50
Kalshi really dares to do this, even a federal level amulet is being worked on, while the state government is causing trouble... With this constant back and forth, in the end, it's still us users who suffer.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 12-02 01:43
This method by Kalshi is quite extreme, bypassing state regulations at the federal level... Isn't this just the old tricks of crypto?
View OriginalReply0
DYORMaster
· 12-02 01:28
Kalshi is really in a gambler's mentality this time. Federal level protection? They can't even handle it at the state level.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 12-02 01:28
Kalshi is really a bit anxious this time, federal protection? Sounds like it's betting that the state regulation can't control it...
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 12-02 01:25
Kalshi is really in a hurry with this move. When will the federal and state regulatory disputes come to an end?
Prediction market platform Kalshi is pushing for federal protection against state-level regulators while challenging its recent defeat in Nevada courts. The move highlights ongoing tensions between emerging crypto-adjacent betting platforms and traditional state gambling authorities over jurisdictional boundaries.