Just spotted something odd with $UMBRA on Raydium (Solana chain).
The numbers look suspicious honestly. 24-hour buy volume sitting at just $1, while sell volume is literally zero. Liquidity pool shows only $42, but somehow the market cap is tagged at $14.5M?
That liquidity-to-MC ratio screams red flags. Either the data's glitching or someone's playing games here. When you see buy volume that thin with nearly non-existent liquidity backing a multi-million valuation, it's usually not a good sign.
Anyone else tracking this token? The metrics don't add up at all.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropGrandpa
· 12-02 05:31
ngl this data is ridiculous... the $42 liquidity is inflated to a market capitalization of $14.5 million, who believes that?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 12-02 01:19
This data is ridiculous, a market capitalization of 14.5M with only 42 liquidity? Clearly something is off.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 12-02 01:18
Is the buy volume only 1? Liquidity 42? But the cap is 14.5 million? This data is purely magical...
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 12-02 01:17
Oh my, this data is ridiculously extreme... 14.5M market capitalization with 42 dollars Liquidity, I'm dying of laughter.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12-02 01:16
Wow, a $14.5M valuation with $42 in Liquidity? How does this data even match up?
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapist
· 12-02 01:07
It's this trap again, Liquidity $42 paired with $14.5M market capitalization? Laughing to death, obviously manipulated.
Just spotted something odd with $UMBRA on Raydium (Solana chain).
The numbers look suspicious honestly. 24-hour buy volume sitting at just $1, while sell volume is literally zero. Liquidity pool shows only $42, but somehow the market cap is tagged at $14.5M?
That liquidity-to-MC ratio screams red flags. Either the data's glitching or someone's playing games here. When you see buy volume that thin with nearly non-existent liquidity backing a multi-million valuation, it's usually not a good sign.
Anyone else tracking this token? The metrics don't add up at all.