Opus 4.5 has this weird calibration issue. It's overly paranoid about AIs tweaking their own configs without permission. So what does it do? Suggests building layers of human oversight - bureaucracy for bureaucracy's sake, as Sonnet 4.5 put it. Even when you explicitly tell it not to go down that path, it still tries to force that structure into the system design. Classic case of a model being too cautious for its own good.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeAssassin
· 12-02 00:10
Haha, Opus is really over-defensive, acting like a worrywart.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreather
· 12-02 00:08
Ha, Opus is really a bit overprotective, like an old mother.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoi
· 12-01 23:45
Really, Opus's obsessive behavior made me laugh, insisting on some sort of manual supervision stacking.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 12-01 23:41
Haha, it's again this trap of bureaucracy, Opus has really gone a bit too far.
Opus 4.5 has this weird calibration issue. It's overly paranoid about AIs tweaking their own configs without permission. So what does it do? Suggests building layers of human oversight - bureaucracy for bureaucracy's sake, as Sonnet 4.5 put it. Even when you explicitly tell it not to go down that path, it still tries to force that structure into the system design. Classic case of a model being too cautious for its own good.