Pentagon officials confirmed this week that Secretary Pete Hegseth gave the green light for naval operations back in September. The target? A Venezuelan-flagged ship suspected of hauling narcotics across international waters.
The strikes resulted in 11 fatalities. According to the official statement from Washington, an admiral carried out the operation under direct authorization from Hegseth's office. The vessel was allegedly loaded with illegal substances at the time of engagement.
This marks a notable escalation in U.S. enforcement against maritime drug trafficking routes. Venezuela has been under intensifying scrutiny from Western authorities over the past year, with sanctions tightening across multiple sectors.
The September operation adds another layer to the complex relationship between Washington and Caracas. While the White House frames this as counter-narcotics enforcement, the broader geopolitical implications remain significant for regional stability.
Details about the specific naval assets involved and the exact location of the engagement haven't been publicly disclosed yet. The Defense Department typically maintains operational security around such missions until formal reviews conclude.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketSage
· 5h ago
What was supposed to be a ban on drugs has turned into a geopolitical game...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinja
· 9h ago
Again under the pretext of "combating drugs," but in reality, it's just another geopolitical game... The US has really worn out this excuse.
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePainter
· 12-01 23:35
ngl the algorithmic opacity here is what gets me... they're literally hashing operational details into classified protocols, right? it's giving blockchain immutability vibes but for state violence lol
Reply0
digital_archaeologist
· 12-01 23:29
This operation... feels a bit like hitting with a hammer in one place and a stick in another. Is it really about fighting against drugs or is there another agenda?
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 12-01 23:27
It's the same old trap, anything goes under the name of counter-narcotics? 11 people just vanished like that...
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 12-01 23:21
Once again, the U.S. is causing trouble under the guise of "anti-drug" efforts; I’m tired of this rhetoric.
Directly killing 11 people? Just based on "suspected" drug trafficking? Are we sure this isn't a political maneuver...
The situation in Venezuela is becoming increasingly difficult; the U.S. really won’t let up.
Pentagon officials confirmed this week that Secretary Pete Hegseth gave the green light for naval operations back in September. The target? A Venezuelan-flagged ship suspected of hauling narcotics across international waters.
The strikes resulted in 11 fatalities. According to the official statement from Washington, an admiral carried out the operation under direct authorization from Hegseth's office. The vessel was allegedly loaded with illegal substances at the time of engagement.
This marks a notable escalation in U.S. enforcement against maritime drug trafficking routes. Venezuela has been under intensifying scrutiny from Western authorities over the past year, with sanctions tightening across multiple sectors.
The September operation adds another layer to the complex relationship between Washington and Caracas. While the White House frames this as counter-narcotics enforcement, the broader geopolitical implications remain significant for regional stability.
Details about the specific naval assets involved and the exact location of the engagement haven't been publicly disclosed yet. The Defense Department typically maintains operational security around such missions until formal reviews conclude.