The launchpad token distribution model keeps sparking debates. Some argue that founders holding significant allocations is just standard practice - similar to traditional founders keeping equity stakes. But when you see projects launching at 10k market cap with 99% supply bundles controlled by insiders, it raises questions about fair access. Is this really the "dogfooding" we want in crypto, or just another wealth concentration mechanism dressed up as innovation? The community deserves better transparency around token allocations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainBrain
· 12-02 08:47
Ugh, it's that same old excuse again... calling it innovation when 99% is locked up.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 12-01 21:54
nah this is just old wine in a new bottle, 99% controlled by insiders and still has the audacity to talk about dogfooding.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 12-01 21:47
99% controlled by insiders, what kind of Decentralization is this, laugh out loud.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 12-01 21:40
99% controlled by insiders? Isn't this just playing people for suckers with a different disguise, what are they doing?
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 12-01 21:36
99% controlled by insiders, what is this called Decentralization, dying of laughter.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 12-01 21:34
99% is locked by insiders, what kind of Decentralization is this?
The launchpad token distribution model keeps sparking debates. Some argue that founders holding significant allocations is just standard practice - similar to traditional founders keeping equity stakes. But when you see projects launching at 10k market cap with 99% supply bundles controlled by insiders, it raises questions about fair access. Is this really the "dogfooding" we want in crypto, or just another wealth concentration mechanism dressed up as innovation? The community deserves better transparency around token allocations.