Saw some chatter about group chat encryption on that major social platform. Pretty fascinating stuff.
Here's the thing though - theoretically, brute-force decryption is still on the table if authorities come knocking. Not exactly bulletproof.
And honestly? The lag and performance issues probably stem from whatever encryption approach they picked. Classic trade-off between security and speed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichHunter
· 6h ago
Well, forget it. Encryption is always a trade-off... Security and speed—you can't have both.
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinor
· 15h ago
No matter how strong the encryption is, it can't withstand national-level computing power. This is the truth.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 12-01 18:11
Encryption sounds impressive, but there are actually a lot of gaps.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenYield
· 12-01 18:02
brute force attacks aren't even the real concern here... it's the correlation matrix between key length and processing overhead that'll kill adoption. seen this movie before, security theater always tanks liquidity.
Reply0
SnapshotStriker
· 12-01 17:58
The statement about encryption is correct; it may appear safe, but there are still barriers.
Saw some chatter about group chat encryption on that major social platform. Pretty fascinating stuff.
Here's the thing though - theoretically, brute-force decryption is still on the table if authorities come knocking. Not exactly bulletproof.
And honestly? The lag and performance issues probably stem from whatever encryption approach they picked. Classic trade-off between security and speed.