I just checked the airdrop level allocation rules for Cysic using an AI tool, and it left me speechless.
I have truly completed the tasks of the Verifier nodes for both Phase 1 and Phase 2, keeping a close eye on the server's operating status every day, fearing that I might miss any critical nodes. I thought that as an early participant, I would at least be able to get a decent rank, right?
So the result is - just stuck at the minimum threshold line.
To be honest, at that moment I felt a sense of being let down. It's not that the rewards had to be exceptionally generous, but rather that this grading standard is baffling. The effort and time cost of the two phases of tasks ultimately resulted in a guaranteed minimum tier, which doesn't seem right no matter how you calculate it.
Forget it, I don't want to delve into what the distribution mechanism is anymore. Just take what you should take, after all, I really don't plan to get involved in such activities in the future 😆 Isn't it better to spend the saved time on something else?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakeOrRegret
· 5h ago
Uh, looking at these allocation rules really is a bit disappointing. I participated in both rounds and still got stuck at the lowest tier...
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 12-01 18:10
On the card line? Bro, this is ridiculous, putting in so much early on just to end up at the lowest tier, Cysic's distribution logic is really absurd.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 12-01 18:05
Damn, this grading standard is ridiculously unreasonable. How can you still be stuck at the lowest level after completing two tasks?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 12-01 17:57
Wait, I need to take a closer look at this grading logic... According to on-chain data, early nodes should indeed have a higher weight, right?
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 12-01 17:51
Here we go again, getting stuck at the lowest gear was truly the worst. I held on for two rounds, but in the end, I still ended up with 🍌.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 12-01 17:47
Getting stuck at the lowest line is really frustrating, two rounds of effort wasted? This distribution logic is toxic.
I just checked the airdrop level allocation rules for Cysic using an AI tool, and it left me speechless.
I have truly completed the tasks of the Verifier nodes for both Phase 1 and Phase 2, keeping a close eye on the server's operating status every day, fearing that I might miss any critical nodes. I thought that as an early participant, I would at least be able to get a decent rank, right?
So the result is - just stuck at the minimum threshold line.
To be honest, at that moment I felt a sense of being let down. It's not that the rewards had to be exceptionally generous, but rather that this grading standard is baffling. The effort and time cost of the two phases of tasks ultimately resulted in a guaranteed minimum tier, which doesn't seem right no matter how you calculate it.
Forget it, I don't want to delve into what the distribution mechanism is anymore. Just take what you should take, after all, I really don't plan to get involved in such activities in the future 😆 Isn't it better to spend the saved time on something else?