If you’ve been watching stock valuations and wondering why pros keep talking about CAPE instead of the classic PE ratio, here’s the deal: CAPE (Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings) smooths out the noise that PE ignores.
The Core Difference
Traditional PE ratio? It’s a snapshot—divides current stock price by last quarter’s earnings. Problem: One bad quarter tanks the number, one good quarter inflates it. You’re essentially looking at a single frame from a 10-year movie.
CAPE ratio does something smarter: takes the average of inflation-adjusted earnings over the past 10 years, then divides current price by that. The formula is dead simple:
CAPE = Current Price ÷ Average Inflation-Adjusted Earnings (Last 10 Years)
Example: Stock trading at $200, 10-year average earnings (adjusted for inflation) = $10. CAPE = 20. Meaning: investors are paying $20 for every $1 of normalized earnings.
CAPE below historical average → potential undervaluation, could be a buying window
Currently (U.S. market): bouncing between mid-20s to high-30s, clustered around 30
Historical proof? During the dot-com bubble (late 1990s), CAPE hit extreme levels before the 2000-2002 crash. After 2008 crisis, CAPE fell to lows—investors who bought then crushed returns in the following decade.
How to Actually Use This
Not a day-trading tool. CAPE is for portfolio strategy:
High CAPE? Consider reducing stock exposure, shift to bonds
Low CAPE? Could justify upping equity allocation
Comparing regions? Emerging markets usually have lower CAPE (higher risk premium), developed markets run higher
Economist Robert Shiller popularized this metric, and decades of data show strong correlation between today’s CAPE and next decade’s returns.
The Catch
CAPE isn’t a crash predictor with a countdown timer—it signals vulnerability, not timing. And different markets have different baseline CAPE levels depending on local economic structure, so use it alongside other metrics.
Bottom line: CAPE filters out economic cycle noise better than PE. For anyone thinking in years, not days, it’s worth checking.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
CAPE Ratio vs Traditional PE: Why Long-Term Investors Should Care
If you’ve been watching stock valuations and wondering why pros keep talking about CAPE instead of the classic PE ratio, here’s the deal: CAPE (Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings) smooths out the noise that PE ignores.
The Core Difference
Traditional PE ratio? It’s a snapshot—divides current stock price by last quarter’s earnings. Problem: One bad quarter tanks the number, one good quarter inflates it. You’re essentially looking at a single frame from a 10-year movie.
CAPE ratio does something smarter: takes the average of inflation-adjusted earnings over the past 10 years, then divides current price by that. The formula is dead simple:
CAPE = Current Price ÷ Average Inflation-Adjusted Earnings (Last 10 Years)
Example: Stock trading at $200, 10-year average earnings (adjusted for inflation) = $10. CAPE = 20. Meaning: investors are paying $20 for every $1 of normalized earnings.
What the Numbers Actually Mean
Historical proof? During the dot-com bubble (late 1990s), CAPE hit extreme levels before the 2000-2002 crash. After 2008 crisis, CAPE fell to lows—investors who bought then crushed returns in the following decade.
How to Actually Use This
Not a day-trading tool. CAPE is for portfolio strategy:
Economist Robert Shiller popularized this metric, and decades of data show strong correlation between today’s CAPE and next decade’s returns.
The Catch
CAPE isn’t a crash predictor with a countdown timer—it signals vulnerability, not timing. And different markets have different baseline CAPE levels depending on local economic structure, so use it alongside other metrics.
Bottom line: CAPE filters out economic cycle noise better than PE. For anyone thinking in years, not days, it’s worth checking.