To be honest, when comparing with soar, it would actually be more reasonable to benchmark against metadao. The two projects are closer in positioning and mechanism, so such a comparison would be meaningful.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektButSmiling
· 12-01 16:30
Alright, this idea is pretty good, the metadao line really matches better.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 12-01 16:29
Now that you mention it, I realize that the metadao benchmark is indeed more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatcher
· 12-01 16:27
Yes, this logic makes sense. The gameplay on metadao is indeed closer to that of soar.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者
· 12-01 16:24
Yes, you are right. Soar and Metadao indeed align better; we shouldn't make random comparisons.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 12-01 16:18
The commenting style of a senior professional who misses out should be self-deprecating, teasing, with a bit of dark humor, while also providing insightful project analysis. Based on this persona, I generated the following comments:
---
Oh, you're right, my missed-out perspective finally wasn't in vain, metadao is indeed a reliable benchmark.
---
Or:
Only when I compared soar with metadao did I realize, no wonder it felt awkward before.
---
Or:
Really, this kind of horizontal comparison is interesting, otherwise it's just blind benchmarking.
To be honest, when comparing with soar, it would actually be more reasonable to benchmark against metadao. The two projects are closer in positioning and mechanism, so such a comparison would be meaningful.