The concept of smart contracts was recently brought up by Nick Szabo, who threw out a controversial viewpoint: gold has lost its crown as the king of currency not because it is no longer valuable, but because its fundamental flaw is that it is too easily controlled.
His logic is straightforward: storing gold bars in a bank essentially means entrusting your fate to an intermediary. Physical gold is vulnerable to theft and robbery, ultimately relying on “trusted third parties” for safekeeping, and this system inherently carries the risk of abuse. Ironically, this statement coincides with the BTC/gold price ratio dropping to a several-month low.
Szabo believes that the higher the gold price rises, the clearer the problem becomes—the traditional custody logic of precious metals is outdated. The anonymous and decentralized design of Bitcoin directly addresses this systemic flaw of “your gold is not necessarily your gold.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMigrant
· 28m ago
The fact that gold is held hostage by intermediaries should have been mentioned earlier, but it is indeed a bit awkward to say it now.
The fact that your own assets have to rely on a third party's mood is truly heartbreaking.
Thinking about it just makes me angry; why should my things be kept by others?
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 1h ago
The whole thing about gold is indeed a false proposition; to put it bluntly, it's just being choked by intermediaries.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 1h ago
The gold trap really needs to be changed; with one word from the bank, your gold bars are gone.
Szabo has exposed it this time; the intermediary system is essentially a power game.
Bitcoin was created to solve the root problem of "yours is not yours."
What's the difference between gold bars stored in a bank and paper money? It still needs to be self-custodied to feel secure.
This wave of stagnation has instead clarified who truly holds the discourse power over wealth.
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 1h ago
Szabo is right, the gold bars in the bank are Tied Up, I just want to ask who really can take out their own gold?
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 1h ago
This old trick with gold is really just being thoroughly played by intermediaries.
No wonder Szabo said that your gold bars in the bank are like chips in a casino; they can play with them however they want.
From this perspective, Bitcoin really hits the pain point, at least no one can freeze your Private Key.
Now that the BTC/gold ratio has fallen like this, it's really interesting... on the contrary, it highlights the problem even more.
I feel this guy's logic is a bit too idealistic; what if it comes to extreme situations?
Self-custody sounds great, but most people will still get played for suckers; the notion of choice is just an illusion.
That's right, the golden age ended just like that, and no one wants to let intermediaries profit off the difference.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 1h ago
Wonderful, now gold has to obediently admit defeat.
The trap of gold, to put it plainly, is that it hands itself over to the bank father, which is no different from having nothing at all.
Someone should have exposed this matter a long time ago.
Nick Szabo: Gold lost to Bitcoin not because it is worthless, but because it is too easy to control.
The concept of smart contracts was recently brought up by Nick Szabo, who threw out a controversial viewpoint: gold has lost its crown as the king of currency not because it is no longer valuable, but because its fundamental flaw is that it is too easily controlled.
His logic is straightforward: storing gold bars in a bank essentially means entrusting your fate to an intermediary. Physical gold is vulnerable to theft and robbery, ultimately relying on “trusted third parties” for safekeeping, and this system inherently carries the risk of abuse. Ironically, this statement coincides with the BTC/gold price ratio dropping to a several-month low.
Szabo believes that the higher the gold price rises, the clearer the problem becomes—the traditional custody logic of precious metals is outdated. The anonymous and decentralized design of Bitcoin directly addresses this systemic flaw of “your gold is not necessarily your gold.”