A central bank chief recently dropped some interesting numbers about Bitcoin allocation strategies. According to his analysis, putting roughly 2.5% of reserve funds into a Bitcoin ETF could deliver returns comparable to bumping U.S. equity exposure from 38% all the way up to 50%—and here's the kicker: without piling on much extra volatility.
He went further with a hypothetical scenario. Had the institution parked 5% of its reserves in BTC a decade ago, the annual returns would have been... well, he didn't finish that sentence in the excerpt, but the implication seems pretty clear: significantly higher than traditional allocations.
What's fascinating here is seeing institutional players openly weigh Bitcoin alongside conventional assets like equities, treating it as a legitimate portfolio component rather than some speculative wildcard. The risk-adjusted return proposition he's outlining suggests crypto might be maturing into something traditional finance can't ignore anymore.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfMadeRuggee
· 12-02 01:26
Can 2.5% really match 50% stock returns? This data sounds a bit outrageous, haha.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSeller
· 12-01 16:08
Damn, the Central Bank has started to calculate Bitcoin accounts, what's going on with TradFi, can it still survive?
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDay
· 12-01 15:56
Wait, the Central Bank is starting to account for Bitcoin? Is this really a change of heart or just another setup before another round of play people for suckers?
A central bank chief recently dropped some interesting numbers about Bitcoin allocation strategies. According to his analysis, putting roughly 2.5% of reserve funds into a Bitcoin ETF could deliver returns comparable to bumping U.S. equity exposure from 38% all the way up to 50%—and here's the kicker: without piling on much extra volatility.
He went further with a hypothetical scenario. Had the institution parked 5% of its reserves in BTC a decade ago, the annual returns would have been... well, he didn't finish that sentence in the excerpt, but the implication seems pretty clear: significantly higher than traditional allocations.
What's fascinating here is seeing institutional players openly weigh Bitcoin alongside conventional assets like equities, treating it as a legitimate portfolio component rather than some speculative wildcard. The risk-adjusted return proposition he's outlining suggests crypto might be maturing into something traditional finance can't ignore anymore.