Bitcoin miner TeraWulf's Q3 revenue increased by 37% year-on-year to $35.4M, which looks impressive, but a closer look at the financial report reveals the real story.
Income has increased, but profits have shrunk:
The cost growth rate far exceeds the revenue growth rate—cost expenditures surged by 46% ($14.9M→$21.8M), directly compressing the gross margin from 42% to 38%. The main reasons are the soaring electricity costs and mining machine depreciation.
The more heartbreaking thing is that the net profit margin fell from 21% to 15%. Although the net income is still $5.3M, this profit margin seems very fragile in the face of Bitcoin price fluctuations.
How are the competitors?
The gross margin of peer Cipher Mining reached 41%, with significantly tighter cost control. Although Riot Platforms has larger revenues of $84.8M, its gross margin is only 31%, and it incurred losses in Q3. It seems that a larger scale does not necessarily mean profitability.
Stock prices and valuations are somewhat disconnected:
WULF has risen 99.5% since the beginning of the year, but the price-to-book ratio is as high as 19.35 times (industry average 2.88 times), which is a clear premium. Analysts expect a loss per share of $1.51 in 2025, which has also widened compared to a month ago.
Core Issue: With the adjustment of mining difficulty and the rising cost of electricity, how long can this low-margin model last? If the BTC price drops or production continues to expand, cash flow pressure will be significant.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
WULF rise without increase in profit, the growth trap for miners?
Bitcoin miner TeraWulf's Q3 revenue increased by 37% year-on-year to $35.4M, which looks impressive, but a closer look at the financial report reveals the real story.
Income has increased, but profits have shrunk:
The cost growth rate far exceeds the revenue growth rate—cost expenditures surged by 46% ($14.9M→$21.8M), directly compressing the gross margin from 42% to 38%. The main reasons are the soaring electricity costs and mining machine depreciation.
The more heartbreaking thing is that the net profit margin fell from 21% to 15%. Although the net income is still $5.3M, this profit margin seems very fragile in the face of Bitcoin price fluctuations.
How are the competitors?
The gross margin of peer Cipher Mining reached 41%, with significantly tighter cost control. Although Riot Platforms has larger revenues of $84.8M, its gross margin is only 31%, and it incurred losses in Q3. It seems that a larger scale does not necessarily mean profitability.
Stock prices and valuations are somewhat disconnected:
WULF has risen 99.5% since the beginning of the year, but the price-to-book ratio is as high as 19.35 times (industry average 2.88 times), which is a clear premium. Analysts expect a loss per share of $1.51 in 2025, which has also widened compared to a month ago.
Core Issue: With the adjustment of mining difficulty and the rising cost of electricity, how long can this low-margin model last? If the BTC price drops or production continues to expand, cash flow pressure will be significant.