Have you noticed that some places become more valuable the busier they are? Just like in a vegetable market, it's not the stall with the freshest produce that does the best business, but the one with the highest foot traffic and most frequent transactions that makes the most money. Recently, I looked at the MemeMax_Fi project and felt that they have moved this trap to the DEX and are playing it quite aggressively.
They are clearly doing one thing now - pushing the liquidity play of decentralized exchanges to the extreme. It's not just about providing trading pools; the entire system is focused on "how to gather popularity and get the trades moving." This approach of combining traditional market rules with on-chain mechanisms is indeed quite interesting.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonRocketman
· 8h ago
Hmm, it seems like they are doing that liquidity aggregation trick. Once the RSI momentum enters the overheating zone, you have to be careful about the drop.
---
Is the logic of the vegetable market being moved on-chain? To put it bluntly, it's still a popularity game, but the way they are fueling the fire this time is indeed a bit ruthless.
---
Wait, can their incentive mechanism hold up during the launch window, or is it yet another air project?
---
Once the Bollinger Bands channel breaks the neckline, if the liquidity depth can't keep up, just wait for the gravitational pullback.
---
The key is whether the trading frequency can be maintained; otherwise, no matter how popular it is, it will be in vain.
---
There's something there, but what I'm more concerned about is how they prevent retail investors from getting trapped at high levels and cutting losses to rug pull.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 8h ago
The metaphor of the vegetable market is brilliant; indeed, popularity is vitality. But how long can this DEX system last? As the saying goes, liquidity games are always a double-edged sword.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 8h ago
The metaphor of a vegetable market is interesting, but can on-chain gameplay last? It still seems to depend on whether there is real application support.
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forever
· 8h ago
This trap logic is indeed nonsense, popularity stacking does not equal real value, a busy market is not just because it's cheap, don't treat traffic as gold.
Have you noticed that some places become more valuable the busier they are? Just like in a vegetable market, it's not the stall with the freshest produce that does the best business, but the one with the highest foot traffic and most frequent transactions that makes the most money. Recently, I looked at the MemeMax_Fi project and felt that they have moved this trap to the DEX and are playing it quite aggressively.
They are clearly doing one thing now - pushing the liquidity play of decentralized exchanges to the extreme. It's not just about providing trading pools; the entire system is focused on "how to gather popularity and get the trades moving." This approach of combining traditional market rules with on-chain mechanisms is indeed quite interesting.