The $RLS compliance chain ecosystem indeed has a solid background. Tether is running on it, JPMorgan has also joined in, and the Central Bank of Brazil even used it to test their CBDC—this lineup is impressive, and there's nothing to critique on the narrative level.

The technical route is quite interesting: it forcibly welds the private subnet of the bank with the DeFi public chain, aiming to maintain regulatory compliance while also reaping the benefits of on-chain liquidity. It sounds like a beautiful story.

However, I am a bit hesitant about the tokens. VC's cost for the coins is ridiculously low, and the team plus investors hold close to 40% of the shares. With this kind of chip structure, does it mean that retail investors are just handing over their shares to institutions? Anyway, I feel a bit uneasy seeing this data.

RLS-63.57%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanPhantom

· 5h ago

With such a low VC cost, aren't retail investors just suckers when they get in? No matter how strong the backing is, it can't save the issue of the chip structure.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiEscapeArtist

· 5h ago

The background is tough, but there are indeed hidden dangers in the token structure. With VC costs being so low, we who enter the market later are just dumb buyers.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiGreenie

· 5h ago

The background noise is loud enough, but I really don't understand the token structure... With VC costs so low and 40% of the chips in hand, aren't retail investors just here to catch a falling knife? --- The lineup of Tether, JPMorgan, and the Central Bank of Brazil is indeed impressive, but I'm more concerned about when the token will unlock. --- The idea of a private subnet welding DeFi sounds great, but whether it can be implemented is another question. --- VCs eating the pie at a low price while retail investors catch a falling knife at a high price, I've played this game too many times... --- I believe in the compliance narrative, but this token structure can't hold up. --- What does it mean that JPMorgan is here? Is it really just speculation? --- With such an outrageous token share, I'm just going to pass and see what happens next. --- Speaking of which, if the team and VCs hold 40%, what can retail investors get? --- The background is solid, but the token design is indeed disappointing. --- The regulatory compliance narrative sounds nice, but the token economics clearly hasn't been thought through.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 5h ago

The background is tough, but the chip structure is really outrageous and can't hold up. VC costs are ridiculously low, are we just here to catch a falling knife?

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
222.66K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
15.93K Popularity
#GIGGLEAndPIPPINSurge
2.67K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
2.11K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
2.97K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
ZYGO戴歌青蛙
MC:$3.37KHolders:2
0.29%
2
XYY喜羊羊
MC:$3.31KHolders:1
0.00%
3
BEARBear Market Coin
MC:$3.38KHolders:2
0.22%
4
BEARACLESBearacles
MC:$3.34KHolders:1
0.21%
5
bobbob
MC:$3.34KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap