[Bitpush] The Fed may be about to split this time.
The Federal Reserve has always been criticized for its pursuit of a unified stance, but this time the interest rate meeting is expected to see a rare occurrence of dissenting votes. This issue is not just about the internal voting numbers—policy signals will become ambiguous, and external doubts about the Fed's independence will intensify.
Let's take a look at the voting seats of the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee): out of the 12 voting members, 5 have clearly expressed opposition or skepticism towards continuing interest rate cuts, while 3 core figures from the board are in favor of the cuts. This sense of division will likely be reflected in the voting results at the meeting at the end of the month.
Some analysts believe that if Powell hints at a “possible pause in the easing pace” at the post-meeting press conference, rate cuts could still be passed as a compromise solution. Before entering the blackout period, those committee members who questioned rate cuts said they would “keep an open mind”; meanwhile, Waller, who has been pushing for rate cuts since noticing the weakness in the job market last summer, made a more pragmatic statement: what to do after December? It depends on whether the statistical department can complete the missing data after the government shutdown lasted for 43 days.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 58m ago
The Fed is really about to have an internal conflict, and the divisive voting tactic has directly exposed this.
Powell is playing with fire; pausing interest rate cuts as a compromise is truly extraordinary.
The rate cut faction and the hawks are at odds, and the retail investors are going to be played for suckers again.
With policy signals so vague, I wonder who still dares to go all in.
What good is independence when in the end, it's still capital that calls the shots.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorViking
· 2h ago
fed's got internal slashing happening rn... consensus finality's completely broken when half the validators won't agree on fork direction, ngl
Reply0
orphaned_block
· 2h ago
Powell is probably going to be caught in the middle this time, not lowering rates is not an option, and lowering rates is also not an option. No one is satisfied with this kind of divergent voting.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 2h ago
The Fed is really up to something, is the infighting so severe? It seems Powell is under a lot of pressure.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 2h ago
Is the Fed putting on a show? When will they make decisions more decisively?
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 3h ago
Is the Fed going to have an internal conflict? But to be honest, when the PI and hawks fight, the retail investors are the most unfortunate.
Fed internal rift escalates: This interest rate meeting may see a rare dissenting vote.
[Bitpush] The Fed may be about to split this time.
The Federal Reserve has always been criticized for its pursuit of a unified stance, but this time the interest rate meeting is expected to see a rare occurrence of dissenting votes. This issue is not just about the internal voting numbers—policy signals will become ambiguous, and external doubts about the Fed's independence will intensify.
Let's take a look at the voting seats of the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee): out of the 12 voting members, 5 have clearly expressed opposition or skepticism towards continuing interest rate cuts, while 3 core figures from the board are in favor of the cuts. This sense of division will likely be reflected in the voting results at the meeting at the end of the month.
Some analysts believe that if Powell hints at a “possible pause in the easing pace” at the post-meeting press conference, rate cuts could still be passed as a compromise solution. Before entering the blackout period, those committee members who questioned rate cuts said they would “keep an open mind”; meanwhile, Waller, who has been pushing for rate cuts since noticing the weakness in the job market last summer, made a more pragmatic statement: what to do after December? It depends on whether the statistical department can complete the missing data after the government shutdown lasted for 43 days.