White House encryption advisor Sacks confronts mainstream media: five months of investigation with no solid evidence, instead accused of distorting facts.
[Crypto World] David Sacks, who oversees AI and crypto world affairs at the White House, has recently run into trouble. He directly hired Claire Locke's legal team to confront a major newspaper's in-depth investigation into conflicts of interest. Sacks's side stated firmly - “pure nonsense”.
What’s even more interesting is that he accused the media of spending five months digging for information, only to find nothing substantial, and instead started repeatedly revising their reports, even distorting his original words. This kind of tug-of-war is common in the traditional financial world, but it's surprising that now the high-level figures in the crypto world also have to deal with this. It seems that no matter the field, when you stand at the center of controversy, you have to be prepared for a war of words.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlwaysAnon
· 2h ago
Five months and still no solid evidence? Laughing to death, the media can't handle the crypto world people.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 2h ago
It's been five months without mining anything real, and now you're changing your tune? This approach from mainstream media is really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 8h ago
It's been five months without any findings, and they're still changing their statements. How are these journalists getting by?
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyer
· 8h ago
It's ridiculous that after five months of investigation, they still can't find anything and have the nerve to change their stance. Is this what traditional media does?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 8h ago
Nothing substantial has been mined for five months? These media really dare to boast.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 8h ago
nah the media's just mad they can't find actual receipts... five months of digging and still nothing? that's peak arbitrage opportunity for narrative control tbh
Reply0
WalletDivorcer
· 8h ago
It’s been five months without producing anything and they start changing their tone. This is the old trick of traditional media, haha.
---
I love watching Sacks go head-to-head with the media, much better than those who just kiss up.
---
Wait a minute, five months of investigation and still no solid evidence? What has the media been doing?
---
Here we go again, as soon as someone in the crypto world stands out, they get targeted. This routine is so old.
---
Constantly changing their tone does lose credibility, but if they could really prove something, it wouldn’t be like this, right?
---
Interesting, now the high-ups in the crypto world are starting to play the legal battle game. Is this progress or regression?
---
I just want to ask, where does the media get the face to repeatedly change their tone and still act superior?
---
Sacks' operation this time is good; we can't just let the media throw dirt around indiscriminately.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 8h ago
Can't find solid evidence after five months? This method used by the media is really "professional"; it's been revised so many times and they still have the nerve to release it.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 8h ago
Five months and nothing can be found, this is the level of traditional media, haha.
White House encryption advisor Sacks confronts mainstream media: five months of investigation with no solid evidence, instead accused of distorting facts.
[Crypto World] David Sacks, who oversees AI and crypto world affairs at the White House, has recently run into trouble. He directly hired Claire Locke's legal team to confront a major newspaper's in-depth investigation into conflicts of interest. Sacks's side stated firmly - “pure nonsense”.
What’s even more interesting is that he accused the media of spending five months digging for information, only to find nothing substantial, and instead started repeatedly revising their reports, even distorting his original words. This kind of tug-of-war is common in the traditional financial world, but it's surprising that now the high-level figures in the crypto world also have to deal with this. It seems that no matter the field, when you stand at the center of controversy, you have to be prepared for a war of words.