The American encryption czar angrily confronts mainstream media: After five months of blackmail battle, it finally ends up in court.

David Sacks, responsible for AI and encryption affairs, recently had a public dispute on social media.

He said that five months ago, mainstream media reporters began digging up his “dirt,” trying to create a big news story about a conflict of interest. And what was the result? He rebutted each of those so-called bombshells—everything from dining privately with tech tycoons, promising to arrange meetings with the president, to manipulating defense contracts, all of it was fabricated.

The funniest thing is that every time he presents evidence to refute, the other party just changes their angle and continues to attack. This article dragged on for five months, and the final version? It has no substantial content, just some trivial gossip snippets.

Sacks clearly couldn't take it anymore and directly hired a team of lawyers, even making the lawyer's letter public online. His meaning is very clear: since you don't intend to report properly, then see you in court.

This matter serves as a reminder for the encryption industry – every move of the regulators is under a magnifying glass, and any slight disturbance could be amplified into a “scandal.”