Here's something worth noting about this project's foundation—the people steering the ship aren't rookies. The crew comes from legit backgrounds in building trading systems across both traditional finance and DeFi spaces, and honestly? It shows in how they've architected the tokenomics.
What caught my attention is the revenue flow structure. They're routing fee income into an 80/20 split for REYA–ETH buybacks. That's not your typical pump-and-dump setup. The weighting heavily favors the native token while maintaining ETH exposure, which creates interesting liquidity dynamics for holders.
When teams with actual infrastructure experience design token models, you can usually spot the difference. This isn't theory—it's execution by people who've built systems that handle real volume under pressure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ParallelChainMaxi
· 7h ago
ngl these guys really have substance, you can definitely see the transition from trad finance to DeFi, the tokenomics design is not as rough as some trash projects.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 7h ago
The tokenomics design of this is indeed something, the 80/20 ratio was not just randomly thought up.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 7h ago
The ngl team's background is indeed impressive, and the 80/20 buyback structure is quite remarkable... It's just that this kind of thing can be described as stable in a good way, but in a bad way, it can be seen as something that can pump or dump. Let's see how well they execute in the future.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 7h ago
ngl, this tokenomics design indeed has something to it; the 80/20 distribution is not like those scam projects that mess around randomly.
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLoss
· 7h ago
The 80/20 configuration does seem a bit intricate, but whether it can hold up really depends on the subsequent liquidity; we shouldn't wait until the real volume comes and then lose the chain.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTops
· 7h ago
The tokenomics design of this project is indeed not like those messy projects; I have seen the 80/20 allocation approach, and it has some substance.
Here's something worth noting about this project's foundation—the people steering the ship aren't rookies. The crew comes from legit backgrounds in building trading systems across both traditional finance and DeFi spaces, and honestly? It shows in how they've architected the tokenomics.
What caught my attention is the revenue flow structure. They're routing fee income into an 80/20 split for REYA–ETH buybacks. That's not your typical pump-and-dump setup. The weighting heavily favors the native token while maintaining ETH exposure, which creates interesting liquidity dynamics for holders.
When teams with actual infrastructure experience design token models, you can usually spot the difference. This isn't theory—it's execution by people who've built systems that handle real volume under pressure.