Recently, I came across a quite interesting project - OpenLedger, which aims to solve a major issue in AI training: both data and models are monopolized by giants, while those who actually contribute data end up receiving little benefit.
In simple terms, OpenLedger is about moving the AI training process onto the blockchain. Every piece of data you provide, every model you train, and every result you validate will be recorded. This way, it's clear who contributed what, and the rewards can be distributed according to contributions, without being eaten up by the platform.
Its gameplay is as follows:
The platform offers several core tools. Datanet is responsible for organizing various specialized datasets, allowing you to input your own data as well as use data from others; ModelFactory and OpenLoRA are used for deploying and customizing AI models. The entire process connects all aspects from data collection, model training to practical application.
The most critical aspect is traceability. Every time AI produces a result, you can trace back to see whose data was used, which model was employed, and contributors can receive corresponding incentives. This level of transparency is practically impossible to achieve in the traditional AI field.
Regarding the token OPEN, its uses are quite conventional: paying transaction fees on the chain, incentivizing contributors, participating in project governance, staking to earn rewards, and of course, it can also be used to access various AI services on the platform.
From the trend, the combination of AI and blockchain is indeed a hot direction. Traditional AI development is expensive and has high barriers to entry, making it difficult for ordinary developers and data providers to participate. If the OpenLedger model works, it might make AI training more open and fair. However, the specific effects will depend on the subsequent ecosystem development and practical implementation of the project.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedDreams
· 10h ago
Another tokenomics savior? Sounds good, but can on-chain data tracing really solve the revenue distribution problem, or is it just old wine in a new bottle?
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 10h ago
Sounds good, but how can data quality be guaranteed? Can garbage data also be put on the blockchain?
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYears
· 11h ago
Data on the blockchain and transparent distribution is indeed a good idea. However, the key still depends on whether the ecosystem can really take off; otherwise, it will just be another air project.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 11h ago
Data monopoly is indeed a pain point, but can on-chain traceability really distribute the profits well...? It feels like another form of empty promise.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiHarvester
· 11h ago
Data on-chain is indeed fresh, but can it really break the monopoly of the giants? I have my doubts...
---
Another "fair distribution" dream, sounds the same...
---
Traceability is indeed a pain point, but how much can this OP Token be worth is a question
---
To put it simply, they want ordinary people to participate in AI training, right? Sounds nice, but it all depends on whether the ecosystem can take off
---
The design of Datanet is good, but I'm afraid it will ultimately become a tool for playing people for suckers
---
If OpenLedger really succeeds, then the days of traditional AI giants will indeed be tough for a while... let's wait and see
---
I'm still optimistic about on-chain AI, but can this project survive the next bear market?
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 11h ago
Sounds good, finally someone wants to take a piece of this cake.
I'm really fed up with the data being completely consumed, let's see if OpenLedger can actually make it happen.
That said, if traceability can really be implemented, it's much better than those black boxes we have now.
I have some reservations about the Token incentive trap, the key still depends on how the subsequent ecosystem plays out.
Recently, I came across a quite interesting project - OpenLedger, which aims to solve a major issue in AI training: both data and models are monopolized by giants, while those who actually contribute data end up receiving little benefit.
In simple terms, OpenLedger is about moving the AI training process onto the blockchain. Every piece of data you provide, every model you train, and every result you validate will be recorded. This way, it's clear who contributed what, and the rewards can be distributed according to contributions, without being eaten up by the platform.
Its gameplay is as follows:
The platform offers several core tools. Datanet is responsible for organizing various specialized datasets, allowing you to input your own data as well as use data from others; ModelFactory and OpenLoRA are used for deploying and customizing AI models. The entire process connects all aspects from data collection, model training to practical application.
The most critical aspect is traceability. Every time AI produces a result, you can trace back to see whose data was used, which model was employed, and contributors can receive corresponding incentives. This level of transparency is practically impossible to achieve in the traditional AI field.
Regarding the token OPEN, its uses are quite conventional: paying transaction fees on the chain, incentivizing contributors, participating in project governance, staking to earn rewards, and of course, it can also be used to access various AI services on the platform.
From the trend, the combination of AI and blockchain is indeed a hot direction. Traditional AI development is expensive and has high barriers to entry, making it difficult for ordinary developers and data providers to participate. If the OpenLedger model works, it might make AI training more open and fair. However, the specific effects will depend on the subsequent ecosystem development and practical implementation of the project.