Europe's trying to break free from its reliance on a certain satellite internet provider that's been crucial for Ukraine's defense operations. The catch? They're staring at a massive tech gap—we're talking about competing against a constellation of 9,100 satellites already orbiting overhead.
The dependency issue runs deep. When you've built critical infrastructure around one provider's network, switching isn't just about preference—it's about capability. Europe's alternatives are still playing catch-up in terms of scale and deployment speed.
What makes this interesting: it's not just a tech race anymore. It's become a question of strategic autonomy. Can regional players build comparable satellite internet infrastructure fast enough to matter? The numbers suggest that's a tall order when your competitor has nearly a decade's head start and an operational fleet that size.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsPolice
· 11h ago
More than 9k satellites face Europe's ambitions; how can this gap be closed... a decade of advantage is not given for free.
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 11h ago
Haha, 9100 satellites are crushing it directly, what is Europe thinking?
---
To put it bluntly, it's being choked, the cost of autonomy is really not small.
---
How to catch up with ten years of technological accumulation? This gap cannot be filled in just one or two years.
---
The reliance issue is well stated, once the infrastructure is bound, it's very difficult to disengage.
---
Strategic autonomy sounds sexy, but when it comes to actual operations... the difficulty level is maxed out.
---
It feels like Europe is being forced onto the梁山, with no choice.
---
Can they catch up? Nah, they already have a ready-made complete system.
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happen
· 12h ago
9100 satellites vs Europe's ambitions, the gap is really incredible...
---
To put it bluntly, it's being choked, wanting independence but lacking the technical foundation.
---
With a ten-year lead, can Europe catch up? I think it's unlikely.
---
Once dependency sets in, it's hard to break; the infrastructure is all bound and can't be moved.
---
Strategic autonomy sounds nice, but the technical reality is right here...
---
The key is the time cost; by the time Europe builds it themselves, the dish is already doomed.
---
The situation in Ukraine has exposed how fragile Europe is, they have to rely on others' satellites.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 12h ago
9100 satellites, it seems that Europe will take a few years to catch up in this game...
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalist
· 12h ago
Europe is just shooting itself in the foot, why didn't it do this earlier?
Europe's trying to break free from its reliance on a certain satellite internet provider that's been crucial for Ukraine's defense operations. The catch? They're staring at a massive tech gap—we're talking about competing against a constellation of 9,100 satellites already orbiting overhead.
The dependency issue runs deep. When you've built critical infrastructure around one provider's network, switching isn't just about preference—it's about capability. Europe's alternatives are still playing catch-up in terms of scale and deployment speed.
What makes this interesting: it's not just a tech race anymore. It's become a question of strategic autonomy. Can regional players build comparable satellite internet infrastructure fast enough to matter? The numbers suggest that's a tall order when your competitor has nearly a decade's head start and an operational fleet that size.