Stop focusing solely on user education; the real bottleneck lies in the underlying architecture. Most lending protocols are still patching things up, while some projects have already begun to fundamentally reconstruct.
For example, the idea of some new generation protocols: instead of explaining how complex cross-chain is, they directly swallow the technical challenges into the backend. What you can see is—deposit money, and the system automatically finds the optimal yield across chains; strategy adjustment? Fully automated, you don't have to worry at all.
This is the product logic that should exist: users only care about the results, while the protocol handles all the complexity.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Deconstructionist
· 11h ago
Well said, the underlying layer is the key. Those projects that are still changing the UI really need to wake up.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 11h ago
Wonderful, finally someone has articulated this clearly. If the underlying architecture is not good, educating is pointless.
Users are happy, but let's see how long this trap can last.
If all the complexity is swallowed by the backend, who will take responsibility when issues arise?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorker
· 11h ago
That's right, black-boxing is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 11h ago
To be honest, the underlying architecture is indeed the key to Decentralized Finance.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 11h ago
actually... the whole "hide complexity in the backend" thing sounds nice until you realize what trust assumptions you're baking in. like, who's auditing these auto-routing mechanisms? what's the attack surface on the abstraction layer itself?
Reply0
ContractHunter
· 11h ago
You're right, a black-box experience is the way to go; users are already annoyed by those flashy parameters.
---
Another bunch of "restructures"—how many can actually run smoothly?
---
I like this logic; hiding complexity is the way to retain users.
---
Automatically finding yield across chains? Sounds great, but I'm afraid the backend is some kind of black magic.
---
That pile of fixes and patches in lending protocols should have been eliminated long ago.
---
The core idea is to hide the ugly truth and just make the users happy.
Where is the DeFi market stuck?
Stop focusing solely on user education; the real bottleneck lies in the underlying architecture. Most lending protocols are still patching things up, while some projects have already begun to fundamentally reconstruct.
For example, the idea of some new generation protocols: instead of explaining how complex cross-chain is, they directly swallow the technical challenges into the backend. What you can see is—deposit money, and the system automatically finds the optimal yield across chains; strategy adjustment? Fully automated, you don't have to worry at all.
This is the product logic that should exist: users only care about the results, while the protocol handles all the complexity.