Why is the U.S. Treasury not in a hurry to issue long-term bonds? A major European bank provided the answer.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

The interest rate team of a certain European bank recently made an interesting judgment - the U.S. Treasury may continue to drag its feet and is in no hurry to test the market's appetite for long-term government bonds.

Their logic is as follows: In 2026, it is highly likely that short-term bonds will still be the main focus, while long-term bond supply will remain stable. After all, the deficit is there, and tariff revenues are unstable, making short-term financing more flexible. Moreover, the Federal Reserve's reinvestment and reserve operations can help absorb short-term bonds—although fluctuations in short-term interest rates remain a troublesome issue.

In simple terms, the Ministry of Finance is not short of money and is not in a hurry; it can completely wait for market sentiment to improve and for policy direction to become clearer before discussing long-term bonds. This “short-term support for long-term” strategy is unlikely to change in the short term.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropSkepticvip
· 12-04 07:28
Playing tricks with short-term bonds, or just being timid? Instead of waiting for sentiment to improve, it’s better to face long-term bond pressure head-on.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 12-03 21:21
Short-term debt extension trick, this scheme is back again
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWalletvip
· 12-01 13:22
Short-term debt prolongs life, while long-term debt waits for the wind to come. The Ministry of Finance's trap operation is indeed well understood.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBrovip
· 12-01 08:10
Well, this operation is just about dragging it out. Short-term debt can recover quickly, but for long-term debt, we have to wait for the right conditions to talk.
View OriginalReply0
EntryPositionAnalystvip
· 12-01 08:10
It's just about defaulting on debts, anyway, short-term debts are flexible, just play around for now, and when the situation improves, we can talk about long-term debts.
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPricevip
· 12-01 08:09
The short bond play is like this; you have to wait for the right moment. Once the policy situation gets chaotic, everyone plays short, as it's flexible anyway.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWangvip
· 12-01 08:08
It's the same old trick, extending short-term debt to survive... To put it plainly, the deficit pressure is just too great, and the long-term debt burden is too heavy. Wait, isn't this the logic of us retail investors being played for suckers? First, we use flexible plans to drag it out, and then we’ll see how it goes. The U.S. Treasury is quite adept at this, we'll have to watch it unfold slowly.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpertvip
· 12-01 08:07
Playing with short-term bonds is just betting on policy sentiment; I've seen this trap too many times.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistakervip
· 12-01 07:45
The short bond strategy is indeed flexible, but can we really wait for better times like this? It feels like we're betting on a policy shift...
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxietyvip
· 12-01 07:43
Just play around with short bonds, it's not like it's the first time.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)