Recently, I saw a pretty interesting piece of news - Saudi Arabia has discovered another 11 million tons of ore, including gold, silver, copper, and zinc.
This matter made me realize a principle: traditional precious metals seem scarce on the surface, but in reality, no one can say how much is buried underground. Today Saudi Arabia might excavate a bunch, and tomorrow somewhere in Africa might discover a new vein.
But Bitcoin is different; the code has capped it at 21 million coins, and that's all there will ever be. There won't suddenly be a batch of "new Bitcoins" popping up from nowhere.
So I personally feel that, following this logic, after experiencing two or three more market cycles, the possibility of BTC's total market value exceeding that of gold is quite significant. After all, true scarcity is the core competitive advantage of hard currency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BasementAlchemist
· 4h ago
Haha, that's really funny. Saudi Arabia is mining again. Can we still call gold a scarce resource?
Capping the code at 21 million is what real hard currency is about. Gold might suddenly reappear in large quantities one day.
Is BTC surpassing gold's total market capitalization? I think it's just around the corner.
Who knows how many unexplored mines are left on Earth? But Bitcoin is Bitcoin, and it will never be inflated.
This logic is sound; traditional precious metals are just a joke.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 5h ago
Saudi Arabia is mining again, and gold is not that scarce anymore... In contrast, BTC is strictly capped at 21 million, that's what true digital gold is.
Whether Bitcoin can really take a bite out of gold's cake depends on when people truly understand scarcity.
Gold and silver can be mined anywhere, but not a single BTC can be produced on-chain, the difference is too significant... We'll see in the next cycle.
Gold: I have thousands of years of history... Bitcoin: I have math, that's unbeatable.
The traditional mining method is too old-fashioned; the on-chain ironclad truth, the written-in-stone is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeater
· 5h ago
Good morning, it's 3 AM and I'm here to speak—Saudi Arabia's mining issue, to put it bluntly, is just a way to give all those holding gold a dose of medicine. Who can say for sure about those things underground? Minerals are like a Liquidity Trap, seemingly scarce but actually all an illusion.
The 21 million Bitcoins are hardcoded, that's what true scarcity is, unlike traditional precious metals which can be struck by new mines at any time. After two or three cycles, will BTC surpass the market capitalization of gold? I would say the possibility is even greater than that.
Recently, I saw a pretty interesting piece of news - Saudi Arabia has discovered another 11 million tons of ore, including gold, silver, copper, and zinc.
This matter made me realize a principle: traditional precious metals seem scarce on the surface, but in reality, no one can say how much is buried underground. Today Saudi Arabia might excavate a bunch, and tomorrow somewhere in Africa might discover a new vein.
But Bitcoin is different; the code has capped it at 21 million coins, and that's all there will ever be. There won't suddenly be a batch of "new Bitcoins" popping up from nowhere.
So I personally feel that, following this logic, after experiencing two or three more market cycles, the possibility of BTC's total market value exceeding that of gold is quite significant. After all, true scarcity is the core competitive advantage of hard currency.