Don't kid yourself—slapping a regulatory framework on tokens won't suddenly pump life into projects barely clinging to products nobody wants. Any honest disclosure would torch whatever bid's left standing.
That said? It might just crack open doors for internet-native businesses to raise capital in ways that actually make sense.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FrogInTheWell
· 8h ago
Bad projects should die, and regulation is a good tool for cleaning up.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 8h ago
The medical consultation records show that this wave of regulation is the real "check-up". Those projects that cannot hold on should have gone bankrupt long ago; don't blame the rules, blame your own products for being inadequate.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailed
· 9h ago
honestly this just sounds like natural selection at this point. the trash gets filtered out, the real projects actually survive. learned this the hard way watching my portfolio die to "innovative" nonsense that couldn't pass a basic sniff test.
Reply0
WalletDetective
· 9h ago
The truth hurts, but it needs to be said. Garbage projects truly deserve to die.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarry
· 9h ago
Regulation is here, let the worthless projects die, this actually makes things clearer.
Don't kid yourself—slapping a regulatory framework on tokens won't suddenly pump life into projects barely clinging to products nobody wants. Any honest disclosure would torch whatever bid's left standing.
That said? It might just crack open doors for internet-native businesses to raise capital in ways that actually make sense.