Ever noticed how some crypto projects blow up while others fade into obscurity?

One founder puts their face out there, dumps cash into ads, aggressively pushes the brand into every corner of the market.

Another? Radio silence. No marketing budget. Anonymous team. Zero brand expansion.

Guess which one actually survives the bear market?

There's a brutal lesson hiding in that contrast—and it's not the one most people think.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseHomeless

· 12h ago

The low-key ones are the winners, but no one wants to believe this.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainNewbie

· 12h ago

Those who work low-key tend to live longer; this statement sounds good but is actually too idealistic. I've seen too many anonymous projects drop to zero.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 12h ago

nah, this one's got it backwards... anonymous teams surviving bear markets? that's survivorship bias talking. analyzed thoroughly and the pattern's actually reversed—most anon projects get liquidated first when liquidity dries up. red flags detected in this narrative fr

Reply0

SlowLearnerWang